ArticlePloS one2009
A biophysical model for analysis of transcription factor interaction and binding site arrangement from genome-wide binding data.
Article in PloS one, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.
- Base-resolution models of transcription-factor binding reveal soft motif syntax.Nature genetics · 2021Article
- Devil in the details: Mechanistic variations impact information transfer across models of transcriptional cascades.PloS one · 2021Article
- Enhancer occlusion transcripts regulate the activity of human enhancer domains via transcriptional interference: a computational perspective.Nucleic acids research · 2020Article
- Mechanistic interpretation of non-coding variants for discovering transcriptional regulators of drug response.BMC biology · 2019Article
- The Role of Chromatin Accessibility in cis-Regulatory Evolution.Genome biology and evolution · 2019Article
- ChIPulate: A comprehensive ChIP-seq simulation pipeline.PLoS computational biology · 2019Article
- Transcriptional interference by small transcripts in proximal promoter regions.Nucleic acids research · 2018Article
- Detection of cooperatively bound transcription factor pairs using ChIP-seq peak intensities and expectation maximization.PloS one · 2018Article
- Uncoupling evolutionary changes in DNA sequence, transcription factor occupancy and enhancer activity.eLife · 2017Article
- Crowdsourcing biomedical research: leveraging communities as innovation engines.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2016Review
- Combinatorial Cis-regulation in Saccharomyces Species.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2016Article
- An Entropy-Based Position Projection Algorithm for Motif Discovery.BioMed research international · 2016Article
- Genome-Wide Analysis of Drosophila RBf2 Protein Highlights the Diversity of RB Family Targets and Possible Role in Regulation of Ribosome Biosynthesis.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2015Article
- Integrating motif, DNA accessibility and gene expression data to build regulatory maps in an organism.Nucleic acids research · 2015Article
- Incorporating chromatin accessibility data into sequence-to-expression modeling.Biophysical journal · 2015Article
- Estimating binding properties of transcription factors from genome-wide binding profiles.Nucleic acids research · 2015Article
- Physical constraints determine the logic of bacterial promoter architectures.Nucleic acids research · 2014Article
- TACO: a general-purpose tool for predicting cell-type-specific transcription factor dimers.BMC genomics · 2014Article
- Predicting tissue specific transcription factor binding sites.BMC genomics · 2013Article
- Mapping yeast transcriptional networks.Genetics · 2013Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHow transcription factors (TFs) interact with cis-regulatory sequences and interact with each other is a fundamental, but not well understood, aspect of gene regulation. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL
findingsWe present a computational method to address this question, relying on the established biophysical principles. This method, STAP (sequence to affinity prediction), takes into account all combinations and configurations of strong and weak binding sites to analyze large scale transcription factor (TF)-DNA binding data to discover cooperative interactions among TFs, infer sequence rules of interaction and predict TF target genes in new conditions with no TF-DNA binding data. The distinctions between STAP and other statistical approaches for analyzing cis-regulatory sequences include the utility of physical principles and the treatment of the DNA binding data as quantitative representation of binding strengths. Applying this method to the ChIP-seq data of 12 TFs in mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells, we found that the strength of TF-DNA binding could be significantly modulated by cooperative interactions among TFs with adjacent binding sites. However, further analysis on five putatively interacting TF pairs suggests that such interactions may be relatively insensitive to the distance and orientation of binding sites. Testing a set of putative Nanog motifs, STAP showed that a novel Nanog motif could better explain the ChIP-seq data than previously published ones. We then experimentally tested and verified the new Nanog motif. A series of comparisons showed that STAP has more predictive power than several state-of-the-art methods for cis-regulatory sequence analysis. We took advantage of this power to study the evolution of TF-target relationship in Drosophila. By learning the TF-DNA interaction models from the ChIP-chip data of D. melanogaster (Mel) and applying them to the genome of D. pseudoobscura (Pse), we found that only about half of the sequences strongly bound by TFs in Mel have high binding affinities in Pse. We show that prediction of functional TF targets from ChIP-chip data can be improved by using the conservation of STAP predicted affinities as an additional filter. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: STAP is an effective method to analyze binding site arrangements, TF cooperativity, and TF target genes from genome-wide TF-DNA binding data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.