Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19956457›Full record

ArticlePrimary care companion to the Journal of clinical psychiatry2009

Antidepressant medication adherence: a study of primary care patients.

Marijo B Tamburrino, Rollin W Nagel, Mangeet K Chahal, Denis J Lynch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Primary care companion to the Journal of clinical psychiatry, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Factors Associated with Antidepressant Medication Non-adherenceTurkish journal of pharmaceutical sciences · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. HEDIS Antidepressant Measures Biased by 2013 Revision.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2015
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Economic factors in of patients' nonadherence to antidepressant treatment.Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 2012
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Achieving adolescent adherence to treatment of major depression.Adolescent health, medicine and therapeutics · 2010
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Marijo B TamburrinoDepartment of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, University of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio, USA. marijo.tamburrino@utoledo.edu
Rollin W Nagel
Mangeet K Chahal
Denis J Lynch

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNonadherence to antidepressant medication significantly contributes to the undertreatment of depression in primary care populations. The purpose of this study was to survey primary care patients' adherence to antidepressant medication to better understand factors associated with nonadherence.

methodParticipants with a history of being prescribed an antidepressant for at least 4 weeks were recruited from a primary care research network. Subjects completed a demographic survey, the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ), the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II), the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey, the Interpersonal Support Evaluation List, the Stages of Change Scale, the Medication Adherence Scale, and the MOS measure of adherence. Differences between adherent and nonadherent patients were compared using chi(2) for discrete variables, independent t tests for continuous variables, and Mann-Whitney U tests for rank-ordered data. Data were collected from April 1, 2001 to April 1, 2004.

resultsApproximately 80% (N = 148) of individuals approached for this study agreed to participate. The overall sample was primarily white and female. The PHQ diagnoses at study entry were dysthymic disorder (8.8%, n = 13), major depressive disorder (31.8%, n = 47), "double depression" (both dysthymic disorder and major depressive disorder, 29.7%, n = 44), and no depression (16.2%, n = 24.) The mean BDI-II score for the total sample was 19.9. Nonadherent patients reported being more careless about taking their medications, were more worried about side effects, were less satisfied with their physicians, were under the age of 40 years, and were more likely to have asked for a specific antidepressant. Nonadherent patients also indicated being at lower stages of change.

conclusionsIndividually tailoring education to patient preference and stage of change is recommended to promote adherence.

Identifiers

PMID19956457
PMCPMC2781031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.