Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19956358›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental review : DR2008

Alimentary Epigenetics: A Developmental Psychobiological Systems View of the Perception of Hunger, Thirst and Satiety.

Christopher Harshaw

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental review : DR, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. The development of interoceptive hunger signals.Developmental psychobiology · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Cross-cultural variation in thirst perception in hot-humid and hot-arid environments: Evidence from two small-scale populations.American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Affective science perspectives on cancer control: strategically crafting a mutually beneficial research agenda.Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2015
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Christopher HarshawDepartment of Psychology, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199.

Funding

Perinatal Determinants of Intersensory PerceptionR01HD048423 · NICHD · FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY · PI LICKLITER, ROBERT E · 2005 to 2009
$860k
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD048423
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hunger, thirst and satiety have an enormous influence on cognition, behavior and development, yet we often take for granted that they are simply inborn or innate. Converging data and theory from both comparative and human domains, however, supports the conclusion that the phenomena hunger, thirst and satiety are not innate but rather emerge probabilistically as a function of experience during individual development. The metatheoretical perspective provided by developmental psychobiological systems theory provides a useful framework for organizing and synthesizing findings related to the development of the perception of hunger, thirst and satiety, or alimentary interoception. It is argued that neither developmental psychology nor the psychology of eating and drinking have adequately dealt with the ontogeny of alimentary interoception and that a more serious consideration of the species-typical developmental system of food and fluid intake and the many modifications that have been made therein is likely necessary for a full understanding of both alimentary and emotional development.

Identifiers

PMID19956358
PMCPMC2654322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.