Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19956109›Full record

ArticleGenes and immunity2009

The Type I Diabetes Genetics Consortium 'Rapid Response' family-based candidate gene study: strategy, genes selection, and main outcome.

C Julier, B Akolkar, P Concannon, G Morahan, C Nierras, A Pugliese, Type I Diabetes Genetics Consortium

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes and immunity, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Type 1 Diabetes Genetics Consortium.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. The pancreas in human type 1 diabetes.Seminars in immunopathology · 2011
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Overview of the Rapid Response data.Genes and immunity · 2009
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

C JulierINSERM U958, Centre National de Génotypage, 2 rue Gaston Crémieux, Evry, France. cjulier@cng.fr
B Akolkar
P Concannon
G Morahan
C Nierras
A Pugliese
Type I Diabetes Genetics Consortium

Funding

Type 1 Diabetes Genetics ConsortiumU01DK062418 · NIDDK · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI RICH, STEPHEN S. · 2002 to 2007
$59.8M
AN NCRR CENTER FOR HIGH THROUGHPUT SNP GENOTYPING AND ANALYSIS: GAIN NETWORKU54RR020278 · NCRR · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI GABRIEL, STACEY · 2004 to 2008
$14.4M
NCRR NIH HHS U54 RR020278NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK062418
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Candidate gene studies have long been the principal method for identification of susceptibility genes for type I diabetes (T1D), resulting in the discovery of HLA, INS, PTPN22, CTLA4, and IL2RA. However, many of the initial studies that relied on this strategy were largely underpowered, because of the limitations in genomic information and genotyping technology, as well as the limited size of available cohorts. The Type I Diabetes Genetic Consortium (T1DGC) has established resources to re-evaluate earlier reported genes associated with T1D, using its collection of 2298 Caucasian affected sib-pair families (with 11 159 individuals). A total of 382 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) located in 21 T1D candidate genes were selected for this study and genotyped in duplicate on two platforms, Illumina and Sequenom. The genes were chosen based on published literature as having been either 'confirmed' (replicated) or not (candidates). This study showed several important features of genetic association studies. First, it showed the major impact of small rates of genotyping errors on association statistics. Second, it confirmed associations at INS, PTPN22, IL2RA, IFIH1 (earlier confirmed genes), and CTLA4 (earlier confirmed, with distinct SNPs) loci. Third, it did not find evidence for an association with T1D at SUMO4, despite confirmed association in Asian populations, suggesting the potential for population-specific gene effects. Fourth, at PTPN22, there was evidence for a novel contribution to T1D risk, independent of the replicated effect of the R620W variant. Fifth, among the candidate genes selected for replication, the association of TCF7-P19T with T1D was newly replicated in this study. In summary, this study was able to replicate some genetic effects, reject others, and provide suggestions of association with several of the other candidate genes in stratified analyses (age at onset, HLA status, population of origin). These results have generated additional interesting functional hypotheses that will require further replication in independent cohorts.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseasePolymorphism, Single NucleotideSelection, GeneticDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1FamilyGenotypeHumansWhite People

Identifiers

PMID19956109
PMCPMC2805447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.