Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19956079›Full record

ArticleMedical care2010

Unintended impacts of a Medicaid prior authorization policy on access to medications for bipolar illness.

Christine Y Lu, Stephen B Soumerai, Dennis Ross-Degnan, Fang Zhang, Alyce S Adams

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical care, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Patterns of Antipsychotic Prescribing by Physicians to Young Children.Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.) · 2016
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Management of Newer Antidepressant Medications in U.S. Commercial Health Plans.The journal of mental health policy and economics · 2015
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Christine Y LuDepartment of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Stephen B Soumerai
Dennis Ross-Degnan
Fang Zhang
Alyce S Adams

Funding

Impact of Prior Approval for Antidepressants in MedicaidR01MH069776 · NIMH · HARVARD PILGRIM HEALTH CARE, INC. · PI SOUMERAI, STEPHEN B · 2005 to 2007
$1.4M
NIMH NIH HHS 5R01MH069776-0NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH069776
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPrior authorization policies (PA) are widely used to control psychotropic medication costs by state Medicaid programs and Medicare Part D plans. The objective of this study was to examine the impact of a Maine Medicaid PA policy on initiation and switching of anticonvulsant and atypical antipsychotic treatments among patients with bipolar disorder.

methodsWe obtained Maine and New Hampshire (comparison state) Medicaid and Medicare claims data for 2001 to 2004; the Maine PA policy was implemented in July 2003. Among continuously enrolled patients with bipolar disorder (Maine: n = 5336; New Hampshire: n = 1376), we used an interrupted times series with comparison group design to estimate changes in rates of initiating new episodes of bipolar treatment and generalized estimating equations models to examine rates of switching therapies among patients under treatment.

resultsThe Maine PA policy was associated with a marked decrease in rates of initiation of bipolar treatments; a relative reduction of 32.3% (95% CI: 24.8, 39.9) compared with expected rates at 4 months after policy implementation. This decrease was driven primarily by reductions in the initiation of nonpreferred agents. The policy had no discernable impact on rates of switching therapy among patients currently on treatment (RR: 1.03; 95% CI: 0.76, 1.39).

conclusionsThe findings of this study provide evidence that PA implementation can be a barrier to initiation of nonpreferred agents without offsetting increases in initiation of preferred agents, which is a major concern. There is a critical need to evaluate the possible unintended effects of PA policies to achieve optimal health outcomes among low-income patients with chronic mental illness. In addition, more research is needed to understand how these barriers arise and whether specific seriously mentally ill populations or drug classes should be exempted from PA policies.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAnticonvulsantsAntipsychotic AgentsBipolar DisorderCost-Benefit AnalysisCost ControlDrug Administration ScheduleGatekeepingHealth Services AccessibilityHumansInsurance Claim ReviewMaineMedicaidMiddle AgedAnticonvulsantsAntipsychotic Agents

Identifiers

PMID19956079
PMCPMC6524522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.