GuidelineSchizophrenia bulletin2010
The 2009 schizophrenia PORT psychopharmacological treatment recommendations and summary statements.
Guideline in Schizophrenia bulletin, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 344 papers, 16 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
344 citing papers in PubMed, 16 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Clinical Practice Guideline on the Choice of First Antipsychotic Medicine for Females Experiencing a First-Episode of Psychosis.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2026Guideline
- Pooled it
- Pharmacological and Somatic Treatments for First-Episode Psychosis and Schizophrenia: Synopsis of the US Department of Veterans Affairs and US Department of Defense Clinical Practice Guidelines.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2025Guideline
- Pooled it
- Weight Gain and Metabolic Changes in Patients With First-Episode Psychosis or Early-Phase Schizophrenia Treated With Olanzapine: A Meta-Analysis.The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology · 2023Pooled it
- Clozapine Optimization: A Delphi Consensus Guideline From the Treatment Response and Resistance in Psychosis Working Group.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2023Guideline
- Predicting antipsychotic-induced weight gain in first episode psychosis - A field-wide systematic review and meta-analysis of non-genetic prognostic factors.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2023Pooled it
- Treatments for Social Interaction Impairment in Animal Models of Schizophrenia: A Critical Review and Meta-analysis.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2022Pooled it
- A Guideline and Checklist for Initiating and Managing Clozapine Treatment in Patients with Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia.CNS drugs · 2022Guideline
- Schizophrenia.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2020Pooled it
- Cannabis use and psychosis: a review of reviews.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2020Pooled it
- Response rates in patients with schizophrenia and positive symptoms receiving cognitive behavioural therapy: a systematic review and single-group meta-analysis.BMC psychiatry · 2018Pooled it
- Increasing antipsychotic dose versus switching antipsychotic for non response in schizophrenia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- Pharmacological guidelines for schizophrenia: a systematic review and comparison of recommendations for the first episode.BMJ open · 2017Pooled it
- Models to predict relapse in psychosis: A systematic review.PloS one · 2017Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Trial
- High-Fat Meal Increase Blonanserin Bioavailability 5-Fold in Chinese Healthy Subjects.Drug design, development and therapy · 2025Trial
- Impacts of a Self-directed Social Resources Study Program on Negative Symptoms and Quality of Life in Schizophrenia Outpatients: A Randomized Controlled Trial.The Kobe journal of medical sciences · 2024Trial
- Safety and Effectiveness of Lurasidone in Patients with Schizophrenia: A 12-Week, Open-Label Extension Study.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2021Trial
284 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In light of the large number of studies published since the 2004 update of Schizophrenia Patient Outcomes Research Team psychopharmacological treatment recommendations, we conducted an extensive literature review to determine whether the current psychopharmacological treatment recommendations required revision and whether there was sufficient evidence to warrant new treatment recommendations for prespecified outcomes of interest. We reviewed over 400 articles, which resulted in 16 treatment recommendations: the revision of 11 previous treatment recommendations and 5 new treatment recommendations. Three previous treatment recommendations were eliminated. There were 13 interventions and/or outcomes for which there was insufficient evidence for a treatment recommendation, and a statement was written to summarize the current level of evidence and identify important gaps in our knowledge that need to be addressed. In general, there was considerable consensus among the Psychopharmacology Evidence Review Group and the expert consultants. Two major areas of contention concerned whether there was sufficient evidence to recommend specific dosage ranges for the acute and maintenance treatment of first-episode and multi-episode schizophrenia and to endorse the practice of switching antipsychotics for the treatment of antipsychotic-related weight gain. Finally, there continue to be major gaps in our knowledge, including limited information on (1) the use of adjunctive pharmacological agents for the treatment of persistent positive symptoms or other symptom domains of psychopathology, including anxiety, cognitive impairments, depressive symptoms, and persistent negative symptoms and (2) the treatment of co-occurring substance or medical disorders that occur frequently in individuals with schizophrenia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.