Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19955182›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of biological chemistry2010

No Splicing, no dicing: non-proteolytic roles of the ubiquitin-proteasome system in transcription.

Thomas Kodadek

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Ubiquitin and proteasomes in transcription.Annual review of biochemistry · 2012
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Thomas KodadekDepartment of Chemistry, The Scripps Research Institute, Scripps Florida, Jupiter, Florida 33458, USA. kodadek@scripps.edu
Scripps Research Institute · US

Funding

Chemical Inhibitors of the Proteasomal ATPasesR01GM087283 · NIGMS · SCRIPPS FLORIDA · PI KODADEK, THOMAS J. · 2009 to 2010
$755k
NIGMS NIH HHS GM087283NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM087283
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ubiquitin-proteasome pathway (UPP) is responsible for most programmed turnover of proteins in eukaryotic cells, and this activity has been known for some time to be involved in transcriptional regulation. More recently, intersections of the UPP and transcription have been discovered that are not proteolytic in nature and appear to revolve around the chaperonin-like activities of the ATPases in the 19 S regulatory subunit of the proteasome. Moreover, monoubiquitylation, which does not signal degradation, has been found to be a key modification of many transcription factors and histones. These various non-proteolytic roles of the UPP in transcription are reviewed here, and plausible mechanistic models are discussed.

Indexed as

AnimalsEukaryotic CellsHumansProteasome Endopeptidase ComplexRNA SplicingTranscription, GeneticUbiquitinProteasome Endopeptidase ComplexUbiquitin

Identifiers

PMID19955182
PMCPMC2807279
OpenAlexW1968406801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.