Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19954751›Full record

ReviewNeuroscience and biobehavioral reviews2010

Genetics and intermediate phenotypes of the schizophrenia--bipolar disorder boundary.

Elena I Ivleva, David W Morris, Amanda F Moates, Trisha Suppes, Gunvant K Thaker, Carol A Tamminga

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Use of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder polygenic risk scores to identify psychotic disorders.The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Elena I IvlevaDepartment of Psychiatry, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75235, USA. ivlevaelena@hotmail.com
David W Morris
Amanda F Moates
Trisha Suppes
Gunvant K Thaker
Carol A Tamminga

Funding

Bipolar & Schizophrenia Consortium for Parsing Intermediate PhenotypesR01MH077851 · NIMH · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI TAMMINGA, CAROL A · 2007 to 2019
$7.8M
Bipolar & Schizophrenia Consortium for Parsing Intermediate PhenotypesR01MH077852 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI THAKER, GUNVANT K · 2007 to 2010
$3.5M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH077851NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH077852
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Categorization of psychotic illnesses into schizophrenic and affective psychoses remains an ongoing controversy. Although Kraepelinian subtyping of psychosis was historically beneficial, modern genetic and neurophysiological studies do not support dichotomous conceptualization of psychosis. Evidence suggests that schizophrenia and bipolar disorder rather present a clinical continuum with partially overlapping symptom dimensions, neurophysiology, genetics and treatment responses. Recent large scale genetic studies have produced inconsistent findings and exposed an urgent need for re-thinking phenomenology-based approach in psychiatric research. Epidemiological, linkage and molecular genetic studies, as well as studies in intermediate phenotypes (neurocognitive, neurophysiological and anatomical imaging) in schizophrenia and bipolar disorders are reviewed in order to support a dimensional conceptualization of psychosis. Overlapping and unique genetic and intermediate phenotypic signatures of the two psychoses are comprehensively recapitulated. Alternative strategies which may be implicated into genetic research are discussed.

Indexed as

PhenotypeBipolar DisorderBrainHumansSchizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID19954751
PMCPMC12779254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.