Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19954749›Full record

ArticlePhysiology & behavior2010

Differential role of mu, delta and kappa opioid receptors in ethanol-mediated locomotor activation and ethanol intake in preweanling rats.

Carlos Arias, Juan Carlos Molina, Norman E Spear

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physiology & behavior, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Delta Opioid Pharmacology in Relation to Alcohol Behaviors.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2018
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Carlos AriasInstituto de Investigación Médica M. y M. Ferreyra (INIMEC - CONICET), Córdoba, C.P 5000, Argentina. afelicidade@yahoo.es
Juan Carlos Molina
Norman E Spear
Instituto de Investigación Médica Mercedes y Martín Ferreyra · ARBinghamton University · US

Funding

Social Anxiety, Stress and Ethanol Sensitivity in Adolescence and AdulthoodP50AA017823 · NIAAA · UPSTATE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY · PI Marvin Rafael Diaz · 2009 to 2026
$30.5M
EARLY ETHANOL--ANALYSIS AND PERSISTENCE OF CONSEQUENCESR01AA011960 · NIAAA · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NY,BINGHAMTON · PI SPEAR, NORMAN E · 1998 to 2008
$1.8M
CONSEQUENCES OF ACUTE ETHANOL EXPOSURE DURING ONTOGENYR01AA006634 · NIAAA · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK BINGHAMTON · PI SPEAR, NORMAN E · 1988 to 1994
–
EARLY EXPERIENCE EFFECTS ON RESPONSIVENESS TO ETHANOLR01AA010223 · NIAAA · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK BINGHAMTON · PI SPEAR, NORMAN E · 1995 to 1999
–
NIAAA NIH HHS P50 AA017823NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA006634NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA010223NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA011960
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The opioid system modulates ethanol intake and reinforcement in adult and preweanling rodents. While adult heterogeneous rats normally do not show ethanol-mediated locomotor stimulation, preweanling rats show it quite clearly. We recently observed that naloxone, a non-specific opioid antagonist, attenuated ethanol-induced locomotor activation in preweanling rats. In the present study we tested the role of specific opioid receptors (mu, delta and kappa) in ethanol-mediated locomotor stimulation and ethanol intake. In Experiment 1 13-day-old rats received naloxonazine (mu antagonist: 0, 7.5 or 15 mg/kg), naltrindole (delta antagonist: 0, 2 or 4 mg/kg) or nor-binaltorphimine (kappa antagonist: 0, 2, 4 or 8 mg/kg) before an intragastric administration of ethanol (0 or 2.5 g/kg), and subsequent locomotor activity assessment. In Experiment 2, the same opioid antagonists were administered on postnatal days 13 and 14 before consumption of ethanol (6%), saccharin (0.05%) or distilled water. In Experiment 1 only naloxonazine reduced ethanol-mediated locomotor stimulation. None of the opioid antagonists affected locomotor activity in water controls. In Experiment 2 naloxonazine and naltrindole suppressed ingestion of all the solutions tested. Similar to what has been reported in adult rodents, mu-opioid receptors seem to modulate ethanol-activating effects during early ontogeny. Hence, there seems to be a partial overlap of neurochemical mechanisms involved in the rewarding and stimulating effects of ethanol in preweanling rats. Mu-receptor antagonists reduced both ethanol-induced activity and ethanol intake, but it is unclear whether the latter effect is specific to ethanol or only a reflection of an effect on consummatory behavior generally, since mu and delta receptor antagonists also suppressed ingestion of water and saccharin.

Indexed as

Narcotic AntagonistsAnimalsAnimals, SucklingDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrinking BehaviorEthanolFemaleMaleMotor ActivityRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyReceptors, OpioidReinforcement, PsychologySaccharinSelf AdministrationEthanolNarcotic AntagonistsReceptors, OpioidSaccharin

Identifiers

PMID19954749
PMCPMC2813937
OpenAlexW2086800566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.