ArticleBiochemistry2010
Variations at the semiconserved glycine in the IQ domain consensus sequence have a major impact on Ca2+-dependent switching in calmodulin-IQ domain complexes.
Article in Biochemistry, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Calcium triggers reversal of calmodulin on nested anti-parallel sites in the IQ motif of the neuronal voltage-dependent sodium channel NaBiophysical chemistry · 2017Article
- Pivoting between calmodulin lobes triggered by calcium in the Kv7.2/calmodulin complex.PloS one · 2014Article
- Kinetic analysis reveals differences in the binding mechanism of calmodulin and calmodulin-like protein to the IQ motifs of myosin-10.Biochemistry · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
We have replaced the semiconserved Gly in the IQ domain consensus sequence with Ala, Arg, or Met in a reference sequence and determined how this affects its complexes with calmodulin. The K(d) for the Ca(2+)-free reference complex is 2.4 +/- 0.3 microM. The Ala and Arg replacements increase this to 5.4 +/- 0.4 and 6.2 +/- 0.5 microM, while the Met increases it to 26.4 +/- 2.5 microM. When Ca(2+) is bound to both calmodulin lobes, the K(d) for the reference complex is not significantly affected, but the K(d) for the Ala variant decreases to 0.9 +/- 0.04 microM, and the values for the Arg and Met variants decrease to 0.4 +/- 0.03 microM. Using mutant calmodulins, we defined the effect of Ca(2+) binding to each lobe, with the C-terminal preceding the N-terminal (C-->N) or vice versa (N-->C). In the C-->N order the first step increases the reference K(d) approximately 5-fold, while it decreases the values for the variants approximately 2- to approximately 10-fold. The second step decreases the K(d) values for the all of the complexes approximately 5-fold, suggesting that the N-terminal lobe does not interact with the semiconserved position after the first step. In the N-->C order the first step increases the K(d) values for the reference complex and Met and Ala variants approximately 15- to approximately 200-fold but does not affect the value for the Arg variant. The second step decreases the K(d) values for the reference and Arg variant approximately 10- and approximately 15-fold and the Ala and Met variants approximately 2000-fold. Thus, both steps in the N-->C order are sensitive to variations at the semiconserved position, while only the first is in the C-->N order. Due to energy coupling, this order is followed under equilibrium conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.