ReviewNature reviews. Neuroscience2010
Neurotalk: improving the communication of neuroscience research.
Review in Nature reviews. Neuroscience, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
54 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Increasing Accessibility to Neuroscience through Translation: Going beyond the English Language.eNeuro · 2024Article
- From Mary Shelley to Netflix: a Pan-European perspective on public communication of neuroscience and neurotechnology.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Article
- Development of Korea Neuroethics Guidelines.Journal of Korean medical science · 2023Article
- Machine-Learning Methods for Speech and Handwriting Detection Using Neural Signals: A Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Poppy Seed Consumption and Oral Fluid Opioids Detection: A Classroom Demonstration of Psychopharmacological Concepts.Journal of undergraduate neuroscience education : JUNE : a publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience · 2023Article
- Neuromyths and knowledge about intellectual giftedness in a highly educated multilingual country.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- The dissemination of brain imaging guidelines and recommendations.IBRO neuroscience reports · 2022Article
- Neuroscience Ambassadors: Creating a Network of Academia-CommunityPartnerships.Journal of undergraduate neuroscience education : JUNE : a publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience · 2022Article
- Integrating Neuroscience Into Clinical Practice: Current Opinions and Dialogue Between Drs. Jacqueline Persons and Kerry Ressler.The Behavior therapist · 2021Article
- Novel bilateral bifurcation of the coronary vasculature.Anatomy & cell biology · 2021Article
- "It's all about delivery": researchers and health professionals' views on the moral challenges of accessing neurobiological information in the context of psychosis.BMC medical ethics · 2021Article
- Piloting of the Just Say Know prevention program: a psychoeducational approach to translating the neuroscience of addiction to youth.The American journal of drug and alcohol abuse · 2021Article
- Lay Public View of Neuroscience and Science-Based Brain Health Recommendations in Slovenia.Frontiers in public health · 2021Article
- Responsible Research and Innovation as a Novel Approach to Guide Educational Impact of Mind, Brain, and Education Research.Mind, brain and education : the official journal of the International Mind, Brain, and Education Society · 2019Article
- The Teenage Brain: Public Perceptions of Neurocognitive Development during Adolescence.Journal of cognitive neuroscience · 2019Article
- Article
- From the Wet Lab to the Web Lab: A Paradigm Shift in Brain Imaging Research.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2019Review
- Fairness in Knowing: Science Communication and Epistemic Justice.Science and engineering ethics · 2018Article
- Resilience, trust, and civic engagement in the post-CCSVI era.BMC health services research · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There is increasing pressure for neuroscientists to communicate their research and the societal implications of their findings to the public. Communicating science is challenging, and the transformation of communication by digital and interactive media increases the complexity of the challenge. To facilitate dialogue with the public in this new media landscape, we suggest three courses of action for the neuroscience community: a cultural shift that explicitly recognizes and rewards public outreach, the identification and development of neuroscience communication experts, and ongoing empirical research on the public communication of neuroscience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.