ArticleGenome research2010
Genome-wide dynamics of replication timing revealed by in vitro models of mouse embryogenesis.
Article in Genome research, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 199 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
199 citing papers in PubMed.
- Parallel analysis of replication timing, gene expression, and copy number with PARTAGE.Genome research · 2026Article
- Transcription elongation can be sufficient, but is not necessary, to advance replication timing.EMBO reports · 2026Article
- Post-replicative chromatin accessibility predicts cell fate change.Stem cell reports · 2026Article
- DNA methylation and lncRNA control asynchronous DNA replication at specific imprinted gene domains.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Structural obstruction to full DNA replication in terminally differentiated skeletal muscle cells.EMBO reports · 2025Article
- PARTAGE: Parallel analysis of replication timing and gene expression.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Single cell multiomics approach to analyze replication timing and gene expression in mouse preimplantation embryos.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Master transcription-factor binding sites constitute the core of early replication control elements.The EMBO journal · 2025Article
- KMT2C/KMT2D-dependent H3K4me1 mediates changes in DNA replication timing and origin activity during a cell fate transition.Cell reports · 2025Article
- Transcription can be sufficient, but is not necessary, to advance replication timing.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Emergence of enhancers at late DNA replicating regions.Nature communications · 2024Article
- MLL3/MLL4 enzymatic activity shapes DNA replication timing.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Repli-seq Sample Preparation using Cell Sorting with Cell-Permeant Dyes.Current protocols · 2023Article
- Replication dynamics identifies the folding principles of the inactive X chromosome.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2023Article
- Replication timing and transcriptional control: beyond cause and effect - part IV.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2023Review
- Modeling the Dynamics of Eukaryotic DNA Synthesis in Remembrance of Tunde Ogunnaike.Industrial & engineering chemistry research · 2023Article
- The location and development of Replicon Cluster Domains in early replicating DNA.Wellcome open research · 2023Article
- Insights into the cell fate decision-making processes from chromosome structural reorganizations.Biophysics reviews · 2022Article
- Distinct signaling signatures drive compensatory proliferation via S-phase acceleration.PLoS genetics · 2022Article
- Optimized Repli-seq: improved DNA replication timing analysis by next-generation sequencing.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2022Article
139 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs) is accompanied by changes in replication timing. To explore the relationship between replication timing and cell fate transitions, we constructed genome-wide replication-timing profiles of 22 independent mouse cell lines representing 10 stages of early mouse development, and transcription profiles for seven of these stages. Replication profiles were cell-type specific, with 45% of the genome exhibiting significant changes at some point during development that were generally coordinated with changes in transcription. Comparison of early and late epiblast cell culture models revealed a set of early-to-late replication switches completed at a stage equivalent to the post-implantation epiblast, prior to germ layer specification and down-regulation of key pluripotency transcription factors [POU5F1 (also known as OCT4)/NANOG/SOX2] and coinciding with the emergence of compact chromatin near the nuclear periphery. These changes were maintained in all subsequent lineages (lineage-independent) and involved a group of irreversibly down-regulated genes, at least some of which were repositioned closer to the nuclear periphery. Importantly, many genomic regions of partially reprogrammed induced pluripotent stem cells (piPSCs) failed to re-establish ESC-specific replication-timing and transcription programs. These regions were enriched for lineage-independent early-to-late changes, which in female cells included the inactive X chromosome. Together, these results constitute a comprehensive "fate map" of replication-timing changes during early mouse development. Moreover, they support a model in which a distinct set of replication domains undergoes a form of "autosomal Lyonization" in the epiblast that is difficult to reprogram and coincides with an epigenetic commitment to differentiation prior to germ layer specification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.