Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19952138›Full record

ArticleGenome research2010

Genome-wide dynamics of replication timing revealed by in vitro models of mouse embryogenesis.

Ichiro Hiratani, Tyrone Ryba, Mari Itoh, Joy Rathjen, Michael Kulik, Bernadett Papp, Eden Fussner, David P Bazett-Jones, Kathrin Plath, Stephen Dalton and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 199 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
199citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

199 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. PARTAGE: Parallel analysis of replication timing and gene expression.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. MLL3/MLL4 enzymatic activity shapes DNA replication timing.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Optimized Repli-seq: improved DNA replication timing analysis by next-generation sequencing.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2022
    Article

139 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Ichiro HirataniDepartment of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306, USA.
Tyrone Ryba
Mari Itoh
Joy Rathjen
Michael Kulik
Bernadett Papp
Eden Fussner
David P Bazett-Jones
Kathrin Plath
Stephen Dalton
Peter D Rathjen
David M Gilbert

Funding

Genome Plasticity during ES Cell Differentiation to Neural LineagesR01GM083337 · NIGMS · SAN DIEGO BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI David M Gilbert · 2007 to 2026
$6.1M
Embryonic stem cell renewal-Myc transcription factorsR01HD049647 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA · PI DALTON, STEPHEN · 2006 to 2010
$1.5M
CIHR FRN 14311NICHD NIH HHS HD049647NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD049647NIGMS NIH HHS GM083337NIGMS NIH HHS GM75334NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM083337
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs) is accompanied by changes in replication timing. To explore the relationship between replication timing and cell fate transitions, we constructed genome-wide replication-timing profiles of 22 independent mouse cell lines representing 10 stages of early mouse development, and transcription profiles for seven of these stages. Replication profiles were cell-type specific, with 45% of the genome exhibiting significant changes at some point during development that were generally coordinated with changes in transcription. Comparison of early and late epiblast cell culture models revealed a set of early-to-late replication switches completed at a stage equivalent to the post-implantation epiblast, prior to germ layer specification and down-regulation of key pluripotency transcription factors [POU5F1 (also known as OCT4)/NANOG/SOX2] and coinciding with the emergence of compact chromatin near the nuclear periphery. These changes were maintained in all subsequent lineages (lineage-independent) and involved a group of irreversibly down-regulated genes, at least some of which were repositioned closer to the nuclear periphery. Importantly, many genomic regions of partially reprogrammed induced pluripotent stem cells (piPSCs) failed to re-establish ESC-specific replication-timing and transcription programs. These regions were enriched for lineage-independent early-to-late changes, which in female cells included the inactive X chromosome. Together, these results constitute a comprehensive "fate map" of replication-timing changes during early mouse development. Moreover, they support a model in which a distinct set of replication domains undergoes a form of "autosomal Lyonization" in the epiblast that is difficult to reprogram and coincides with an epigenetic commitment to differentiation prior to germ layer specification.

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyAnimalsCell DifferentiationCell LineChromatinCpG IslandsDNA Replication TimingDown-RegulationEmbryonic DevelopmentEmbryonic Stem CellsEpigenesis, GeneticFemaleGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalGerm LayersHomeodomain ProteinsMiceChromatinHomeodomain ProteinsNanog Homeobox ProteinNanog protein, mouseOctamer Transcription Factor-3Pou5f1 protein, mouseSox2 protein, mouseSOXB1 Transcription Factors

Identifiers

PMID19952138
PMCPMC2813472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.