Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19950367›Full record

ArticleProteins2010

Cooperative nature of gating transitions in K(+) channels as seen from dynamic importance sampling calculations.

Elizabeth J Denning, Thomas B Woolf

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proteins, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Hydrophobic plug functions as a gate in voltage-gated proton channels.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Elizabeth J DenningDepartment of Biophysics and Biophysical Chemistry, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, USA.
Thomas B Woolf

Funding

Structure and Affinity: Computing FABP-Lipid SelectivityR01GM064746 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI WOOLF, THOMAS B · 2003 to 2006
$1.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM064746NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM064746
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The growing dataset of K(+) channel x-ray structures provides an excellent opportunity to begin a detailed molecular understanding of voltage-dependent gating. These structures, while differing in sequence, represent either a stable open or closed state. However, an understanding of the molecular details of gating will require models for the transitions and experimentally testable predictions for the gating transition. To explore these ideas, we apply dynamic importance sampling to a set of homology models for the molecular conformations of K(+) channels for four different sets of sequences and eight different states. In our results, we highlight the importance of particular residues upstream from the Pro-Val-Pro (PVP) region to the gating transition. This supports growing evidence that the PVP region is important for influencing the flexibility of the S6 helix and thus the opening of the gating domain. The results further suggest how gating on the molecular level depends on intra-subunit motions to influence the cooperative behavior of all four subunits of the K(+) channel. We hypothesize that the gating process occurs in steps: first sidechain movement, then inter-S5-S6 subunit motions, and lastly the large-scale domain rearrangements.

Indexed as

Protein Structure, SecondaryAmino Acid SequenceComputer SimulationCrystallography, X-RayIon Channel GatingModels, MolecularMolecular Sequence DataMutationPotassium ChannelsProtein SubunitsSequence AlignmentPotassium ChannelsProtein Subunits

Identifiers

PMID19950367
PMCPMC2822122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.