ArticleMolecular imaging and biology2010
Feasibility of template-guided attenuation correction in cat brain PET imaging.
Article in Molecular imaging and biology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Unified Deep Learning-Based Mouse Brain MR Segmentation: Template-Based Individual Brain Positron Emission Tomography Volumes-of-Interest Generation Without Spatial Normalization in Mouse Alzheimer Model.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2022Article
- A Brief History of Nuclear Medicine Physics, Instrumentation, and Data Sciences in Korea.Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021Review
- Integrated whole body MR/PET: where are we?Korean journal of radiologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAttenuation correction (AC) is important in quantitative positron emission tomography (PET) imaging of medium-sized animals such as the cat. However, additional time for transmission (TX) scanning and tracer uptake is required in PET studies with animal-dedicated PET scanners because post-injection TX scanning is not available in these systems. The aim of this study was to validate a template-guided AC (TGAC) method that does not require TX PET data for AC in cat 2-deoxy-2-[F-(18)fluoro-D-glucose (FDG) brain PET imaging.
methodsPET scans were acquired using a microPET Focus 120 scanner. TX data were obtained using a (68)Ge point source before the injection of FDG. To generate the attention map (mu-map) template for the TGAC, a target image of emission (EM) PET was selected, and spatial normalization parameters of individual EM data onto the target were reapplied to the corresponding mu-maps. The inverse transformations of the mu-map template into the individual spaces were performed, and the transformed template was forward projected to generate the AC factor. The TGAC method was compared with measured AC (MAC) and calculated AC (CAC) methods using region of interest (ROI) and SPM analyses.
resultsThe ROI analysis showed that the activity of the TGAC EM PET images strongly correlated with those of the MAC data (y = 0.98x + 0.01, R(2) = 0.96). In addition, no significant difference was observed in the SPM analysis. By contrast, the CAC showed a significantly higher uptake in the deep gray regions compared to the MAC (corrected P < 0.05). The ROI correlation with MAC was worse than with the TGAC (R(2) = 0.84). In SPM analysis for the voxel-wise group comparisons between before and after the induction of deafness, only the TGAC showed equivalent results with the MAC.
conclusionsThe TGAC was reliable in cat FDG brain PET studies in terms of compatibility with the MAC method. The TGAC might be a useful option for increasing study throughput and decreasing the probability of subject movement. In addition, it might reduce the possible biological effects of long-term anesthesia on the cat brain in investigations using animal-dedicated PET scanners.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.