Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19949912›Full record

ArticlePathology oncology research : POR2010

Clinical significance of ephrin (eph)-A1, -A2, -a4, -a5 and -a7 receptors in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Constantinos Giaginis, Gerasimos Tsourouflis, Adamantia Zizi-Serbetzoglou, Gregorios Kouraklis, Elli Chatzopoulou, Konstantina Dimakopoulou, Stamatios E Theocharis

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pathology oncology research : POR, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Therapeutic advances of targeting receptor tyrosine kinases in cancer.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Eph Receptors in Cancer.Biomedicines · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. The role of EphA7 in different tumors.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Constantinos GiaginisDepartment of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, Medical School, University of Athens, 75 Mikras Asias str., Athens, 11527, Greece.
Gerasimos Tsourouflis
Adamantia Zizi-Serbetzoglou
Gregorios Kouraklis
Elli Chatzopoulou
Konstantina Dimakopoulou
Stamatios E Theocharis

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ephrin (Eph) receptors have been reported to be frequently overexpressed in a wide variety of cancer types, being associated with tumor growth, invasion, metastasis and angiogenesis. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the clinical significance of Eph-A1, -A2, -A4, -A5 and -A7 expression in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Eph-A1, -A2, -A4, -A5 and -A7 expression and staining intensity were assessed immunohistochemically in tumoral samples of 67 pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients and were statistically analyzed in relation to clinicopathological characteristics, tumor proliferative capacity and patients' survival. Eph receptors were abundantly expressed in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cases examined. Eph-A1 staining intensity was significantly associated with tumor size (pT, p = 0.008) and tumor histopathological stage (pStage, p = 0.012). Eph-A2 expression was significantly associated with patients' age (p = 0.007), while Eph-A4 and Eph-A5 with tumor proliferative capacity (p = 0.019 and p = 0.011, respectively). Pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients with moderate/intense Eph-A5 or Eph-A7 staining presented significantly shorter survival times compared to those with negative/mild one (log-rank test, p = 0.024 and p = 0.009, respectively). Multivariate analysis identified Eph-A5 and Eph-A7 staining intensity as independent prognostic factors (p = 0.048 and p = 0.004, respectively). In conclusion, the present study revealed that Eph receptors were associated with pancreatic cancer characteristics, supporting evidence for their potential clinical application in management and prognosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients.

Indexed as

AgedBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleNeoplasm StagingPancreatic NeoplasmsPrognosisReceptor, EphA1Receptor, EphA2Receptor, EphA4Receptor, EphA5Receptor, EphA7Biomarkers, TumorReceptor, EphA1Receptor, EphA2Receptor, EphA4Receptor, EphA5Receptor, EphA7Receptors, Eph Family

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.