Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19949835›Full record

ArticlePlant molecular biology2010

Comparative transcript analyses of the ovule, microspore, and mature pollen in Brassica napus.

Carrie A Whittle, Meghna R Malik, Rong Li, Joan E Krochko

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Plant molecular biology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Identification, Gene Structure, and Expression ofFrontiers in plant science · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Bioinformatics resources for pollen.Plant reproduction · 2016
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Carrie A WhittlePlant Biotechnology Institute, National Research Council of Canada, 110 Gymnasium Place, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 0W9, Canada.
Meghna R Malik
Rong Li
Joan E Krochko
Plant Biotechnology Institute · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcriptome data for plant reproductive organs/cells currently is very limited as compared to sporophytic tissues. Here, we constructed cDNA libraries and obtained ESTs for Brassica napus pollen (4,864 ESTs), microspores (i.e., early stage pollen development; 6,539 ESTs) and ovules (10,468 ESTs). Clustering and assembly of the 21,871 ESTs yielded a total of 10,782 unigenes, with 3,362 contigs and 7,420 singletons. The pollen transcriptome contained high levels of polygalacturonases and pectinesterases, which are involved in cell wall synthesis and expansion, and very few transcription factors or transcripts related to protein synthesis. The set of genes expressed in mature pollen showed little overlap with genes expressed in ovules or in microspores, suggesting in the latter case that a marked differentiation had occurred from the early microspore stages through to pollen development. Remarkably, the microspores and ovules exhibited a high number of co-expressed genes (N = 1,283) and very similar EST functional profiles, including high transcript numbers for transcriptional and translational processing genes, protein modification genes and unannotated genes. In addition, examination of expression values for genes co-expressed among microspores and ovules revealed a highly statistically significant correlation among these two tissues (R = 0.360, P = 1.2 x 10(-40)) as well as a lack of differentially expressed genes. Overall, the results provide new insights into the transcriptional profile of rarely studied ovules, the transcript changes during pollen development, transcriptional regulation of pollen tube growth and germination, and describe the parallels in the transcript populations of microspore and ovules which could have implications for understanding the molecular foundation of microspore totipotency in B. napus.

Indexed as

Brassica napusExpressed Sequence TagsGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, PlantGenes, PlantGenome, PlantGerminationOvulePollenRNA, MessengerRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID19949835
OpenAlexW1986954297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.