ArticlePediatric cardiology2010
Parental knowledge and attitudes toward hypertrophic cardiomyopathy genetic testing.
Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Parental knowledge and attitudes toward genetic counseling and childhood genetic testing for congenital anomalies in Qatar.Journal of genetic counseling · 2025Article
- Evaluation of face validity and core concepts of a novel knowledge scale for inherited heart disease: A pilot study.Journal of genetic counseling · 2025Article
- Factors Associated with Uptake of Genetics Services for Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.Journal of genetic counseling · 2015Article
- Genetic knowledge and attitudes of parents of children with congenital heart defects.American journal of medical genetics. Part A · 2014Article
- Uptake of cardiac screening and genetic testing among hypertrophic and dilated cardiomyopathy families.Journal of genetic counseling · 2013Article
- Impact of Mendelian inheritance in cardiovascular disease.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2010Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a common autosomal dominant condition with an increased risk of sudden cardiac death. Although clinical genetic testing can be used for confirmation of a clinical diagnosis as well as a predictive test, based on our clinical experience it is underutilized. Therefore, we developed and administered a questionnaire to assess potential determinants of parental interest in this testing. Of the 30 adult caregivers who participated, 80% had heard of genetic testing, whereas only 30% knew about genetic testing specifically for HCM. Once informed of the availability, 62% said they would consider testing in the future and 28% would consider it in the next year. Participants' younger age, higher education level, knowledge of carrier testing, and positive view of genetic testing were significantly associated with the participant considering HCM genetic testing for their child (p <or= 0.05). Based on a logistic regression model, age, education level, and knowing that HCM is an inherited disease were the best predictors of who would consider genetic testing. This study provides healthcare providers with a framework to understand caregivers' knowledge and views of genetic testing, which can be used to improve clinical care for pediatric HCM patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
19949785What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.