Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19949694›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomolecular techniques : JBT2009

An assessment of air as a source of DNA contamination encountered when performing PCR.

Nina Witt, Gillian Rodger, Jo Vandesompele, Vladimir Benes, Alimuddin Zumla, Graham A Rook, Jim F Huggett

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomolecular techniques : JBT, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Nasal bacterial microbiota during an outbreak of equine herpesvirus 1 at a farm in southern Ontario.Canadian journal of veterinary research = Revue canadienne de recherche veterinaire · 2021
    Article
  8. Multiplex detection of six swine viruses on an integrated centrifugal disk using loop-mediated isothermal amplification.Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Defending Our Public Biological Databases as a Global Critical Infrastructure.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2019
    Article
  11. Polymerase Chain Reaction and Its Application in the Diagnosis of Infectious Keratitis.Medical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal · 2019
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Progress in metagenomics requires a balanced appraisal of the available technologies.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2013
    Article
  17. Distinct DNA methylomes of newborns and centenarians.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nina WittCentre for Infectious Diseases and International Health, Windeyer Institute for Medical Sciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Gillian Rodger
Jo Vandesompele
Vladimir Benes
Alimuddin Zumla
Graham A Rook
Jim F Huggett

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sensitive molecular methods, such as the PCR, can detect low-level contamination, and careful technique is required to reduce the impact of contaminants. Yet, some assays that are designed to detect high copy-number target sequences appear to be impossible to perform without contamination, and frequently, personnel or laboratory environment are held responsible as the source. This complicates diagnostic and research analysis when using molecular methods. To investigate the air specifically as a source of contamination, which might occur during PCR setup, we exposed tubes of water to the air of a laboratory and clean hood for up to 24 h. To increase the chances of contamination, we also investigated a busy open-plan office in the same way. All of the experiments showed the presence of human and rodent DNA contamination. However, there was no accumulation of the contamination in any of the environments investigated, suggesting that the air was not the source of contamination. Even the air from a busy open-plan office was a poor source of contamination for all of the DNA sequences investigated (human, bacterial, fungal, and rodent). This demonstrates that the personnel and immediate laboratory environment are not necessarily to blame for the observed contamination.

Indexed as

AirAir MovementsAir PollutantsAlu ElementsAnimalsBase SequenceCandidaDNADNA, RibosomalEnvironmental MonitoringHumansMiceMolecular Sequence DataPolymerase Chain ReactionSequence Homology, Nucleic AcidAir PollutantsDNADNA, Ribosomal16S rDNAAlu repeatB1 elementqPCRreal-time PCR

Identifiers

PMID19949694
PMCPMC2777341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.