ArticleJournal of Korean medical science2009
Long-term results of laparoscopic Burch colposuspension for stress urinary incontinence in women.
Article in Journal of Korean medical science, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- TVT versus laparoscopic mesh colposuspension: 5-year follow-up results of a randomized clinical trial.International urogynecology journal · 2015Trial
- Surgical decision-making for primary stress urinary incontinence: insights from a nationwide survey of gynecologists in Turkey.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- The Efficacy of Modified Laparoscopic Burch Procedure Using a Single Stitch on Each Side of the Urethra for the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Evaluating Patient Preferences and Clinical Outcomes for Modified Laparoscopic Burch Colposuspension and Transobturator Tape Procedures in Stress Urinary Incontinence Treatment.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- The Novel and Minimally Invasive Treatment Modalities for Female Pelvic Floor Muscle Dysfunction; Beyond the TraditionalBalkan medical journal · 2018Review
- Retraction Note: Stress urinary incontinence: long-term results of laparoscopic Burch colposuspension.BMC surgery · 2016Article
- Pleated colposuspension: Our modification of Burch colposuspension.Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India · 2013Article
- Outcome Assessment of the Marshall Coughing Test during Cervix Reposition Maneuver in Women with Urinary Stress Incontinence with/without Genital Prolapse.ISRN urology · 2012Article
- Current Treatments for Female Pelvic Floor Dysfunctions.Gynecology and minimally invasive therapyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We evaluated the long-term efficacy of laparoscopic Burch colposuspension for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in women. A total of 68 patients who underwent extraperitoneal laparoscopic Burch colposuspensions with more than a 3-yr follow-up were included. The colposuspension was performed by using two non-absorbable sutures on each side. The patients were considered to be cured of SUI if they had a negative result of cough stress test and there were no reports of urine leakage during physical stress. The mean follow-up period was 52 months (range, 36 to 83 months). The overall subjective cure rate was reported in 49 patients (72%). There was no significant difference between the cured and non-cured group in terms of clinical parameters. The cure rate tended to decline gradually over time and it was more deteriorated significantly after 4 yr of surgery. Based on these results, we recommend that long-term follow-up is needed when evaluating the clinical efficacy of anti-incontinence surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.