ArticleFly
Disruption of photoreceptor cell patterning in the Drosophila Scutoid mutant.
Article in Fly. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genome-Wide Association Study and transcriptome analysis reveals a complex gene network that regulates opsin gene expression and cell fate determination inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Functional opsin patterning for Drosophila color vision is established through signaling pathways in adjacent object-detection neurons.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2024Article
- Article
- An infection of Enterobacter ludwigii affects development and causes age-dependent neurodegeneration in Drosophila melanogaster.Invertebrate neuroscience : IN · 2019Article
- Disruption of olfactory receptor neuron patterning in Scutoid mutant Drosophila.Molecular and cellular neurosciences · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Cell fate determination in many systems is based upon inductive events driven by cell-cell interactions. Inductive signaling regulates many aspects of Drosophila compound eye development. Accumulating evidence suggests that the color sensitivity of the R8 photoreceptor cell within an individual ommatidium is regulated by an inductive signal from the adjacent R7 photoreceptor cell. This signal is thought to control an induced versus default cell-fate switch that coordinates the visual pigment expression and color sensitivities of adjacent R7 and R8 photoreceptor cells. Here we describe a disruption in R7 and R8 cell patterning in Scutoid mutants that is due to inappropriate signals from Rh4-expressing R7 cells inducing Rh5 expression in adjacent R8 cells. This dominant phenotype results from the misexpression of the transcriptional repressor snail, which with the co-repressor C-terminal-Binding-Protein represses rhomboid expression in the developing eye. We show that loss of rhomboid suppresses the Scutoid phenotype. However in contrast to the loss of rhomboid alone, which entirely blocks the normal inductive signal from the R7 to the R8 photoreceptor cell, Scutoid rhomboid double mutants display normal Rh5 and Rh6 expression. Our detailed analysis of this unusual dominant gain-of-function neomorphic phenotype suggests that the induction of Rh5 expression in Scutoid mutants is partially rhomboid independent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.