Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19949110›Full record

ArticleJournal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950)2010

Altered CD8(+) T cell immunodominance after vaccinia virus infection and the naive repertoire in inbred and F(1) mice.

Inge E A Flesch, Wai-Ping Woo, Yang Wang, Vijay Panchanathan, Yik-Chun Wong, Nicole L La Gruta, Tania Cukalac, David C Tscharke

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Immunoinformatics: Predicting Peptide-MHC Binding.Annual review of biomedical data science · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Ecological analysis of antigen-specific CTL repertoires defines the relationship between naive and immune T-cell populations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2013
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Inge E A FleschResearch School of Biology, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
Wai-Ping Woo
Yang Wang
Vijay Panchanathan
Yik-Chun Wong
Nicole L La Gruta
Tania Cukalac
David C Tscharke
Australian National University · AUUniversity of Melbourne · AUQIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute · AU

Funding

CD8+ T cell specificity in mouse models of smallpox vaccination and challengeR01AI067401 · NIAID · AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY · PI TSCHARKE, DAVID CARL · 2006 to 2008
$736k
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI067401
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous studies of CD8(+) T cell immunodominance after primary virus infection of F(1) mice compared with their inbred parents have generally concluded that no dramatic changes occur. In this study, we revisit this issue using vaccinia virus (VACV), which has a large genome, a recently defined immunodominance hierarchy in mice, and is a candidate vector for vaccines. We found that immunogenicity of VACV peptides defined using inbred mice was highly variable in F(1) progeny: some peptides were equally immunogenic in F(1) and inbred, whereas others elicited responses that were reduced by >90% in F(1) mice. Furthermore, the dominance of a peptide in the relevant inbred parent did not predict whether it would be poorly immunogenic in F(1) mice. This result held using F(1) hybrids of MHC-congenic mice, suggesting that MHC differences alone were responsible. It was also extended to foreign epitopes expressed by an rVACV vaccine. F(1) mice were less able to mount responses to the poorly immunogenic peptides when used as a sole immunogen, ruling out immunodomination. In addition, conserved TCR Vbeta usage between inbred and F(1) mice did not always correlate with strong responses in F(1) mice. However, direct estimation of naive precursor numbers showed that these were reduced in F(1) compared with inbred mice for specificities that were poorly immunogenic in the hybrids. These data have implications for our understanding of the extent to which MHC diversity alters the range of epitopes that are immunogenic in outbred populations.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntigens, ViralCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesEpitopes, T-LymphocyteImmunodominant EpitopesImmunogenetic PhenomenaMajor Histocompatibility ComplexMiceVacciniaVaccinia virusAntigens, ViralEpitopes, T-LymphocyteImmunodominant Epitopes

Identifiers

PMID19949110
PMCPMC2845786
OpenAlexW1786123680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.