Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19948030›Full record

ReviewMolecular pain2009

Purinergic mechanosensory transduction and visceral pain.

Geoffrey Burnstock

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular pain, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 123 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. The Pulmonary NEB ME Is a Complex Intraepithelial Unit.Advances in anatomy, embryology, and cell biology · 2021
    Article
  9. Pulmonary Sensory Receptors.Advances in anatomy, embryology, and cell biology · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Purinergic Signalling: Therapeutic Developments.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2017
    Review
  16. Article
  17. P2X receptors.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2016
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Geoffrey BurnstockAutonomic Neuroscience Centre, Royal Free and University College Medical School, Rowland Hill Street, London NW3 2PF, UK. g.burnstock@ucl.ac.uk
The Royal Free Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this review, evidence is presented to support the hypothesis that mechanosensory transduction occurs in tubes and sacs and can initiate visceral pain. Experimental evidence for this mechanism in urinary bladder, ureter, gut, lung, uterus, tooth-pulp and tongue is reviewed. Potential therapeutic strategies are considered for the treatment of visceral pain in such conditions as renal colic, interstitial cystitis and inflammatory bowel disease by agents that interfere with mechanosensory transduction in the organs considered, including P2X3 and P2X2/3 receptor antagonists that are orally bioavailable and stable in vivo and agents that inhibit or enhance ATP release and breakdown.

Indexed as

AnimalsHumansMechanotransduction, CellularModels, BiologicalPainPurinergic P2 Receptor AntagonistsReceptors, Purinergic P2X3VisceraP2RX3 protein, humanPurinergic P2 Receptor AntagonistsReceptors, Purinergic P2X3

Identifiers

PMID19948030
PMCPMC2789721
OpenAlexW2127651585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.