Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19946364›Full record

ArticlePloS one2009

Evaluation of group genetic ancestry of populations from Philadelphia and Dakar in the context of sex-biased admixture in the Americas.

Klara Stefflova, Matthew C Dulik, Athma A Pai, Amy H Walker, Charnita M Zeigler-Johnson, Serigne M Gueye, Theodore G Schurr, Timothy R Rebbeck

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Klara StefflovaDepartment of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America. Klara.Stefflova@cancer.org.uk
Matthew C Dulik
Athma A Pai
Amy H Walker
Charnita M Zeigler-Johnson
Serigne M Gueye
Theodore G Schurr
Timothy R Rebbeck
University of Pennsylvania · USCheikh Anta Diop University · SN

Funding

Segregation and Racial Disparities in Prostate CancerP50CA105641 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI REBBECK, TIMOTHY R · 2003 to 2009
$9.6M
MOLECULAR EPIDEMIOLOGY OF PROSTATE CANCERR01CA085074 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI REBBECK, TIMOTHY R · 1999 to 2010
$2.9M
MOLECULAR EPIDEMIOLOGY OF PROSTATE CANCERR29ES008031 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI REBBECK, TIMOTHY R · 1995 to 1999
–
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA105641NCI NIH HHS P50-CA105641NCI NIH HHS R01 CA085074NCI NIH HHS R01-CA85074NIEHS NIH HHS R29-ES08031
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPopulation history can be reflected in group genetic ancestry, where genomic variation captured by the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) and non-recombining portion of the Y chromosome (NRY) can separate female- and male-specific admixture processes. Genetic ancestry may influence genetic association studies due to differences in individual admixture within recently admixed populations like African Americans. PRINCIPAL

findingsWe evaluated the genetic ancestry of Senegalese as well as European Americans and African Americans from Philadelphia. Senegalese mtDNA consisted of approximately 12% U haplotypes (U6 and U5b1b haplotypes, common in North Africa) while the NRY haplotypes belonged solely to haplogroup E. In Philadelphia, we observed varying degrees of admixture. While African Americans have 9-10% mtDNAs and approximately 31% NRYs of European origin, these results are not mirrored in the mtDNA/NRY pools of European Americans: they have less than 7% mtDNAs and less than 2% NRYs from non-European sources. Additionally, there is <2% Native American contribution to Philadelphian African American ancestry and the admixture from combined mtDNA/NRY estimates is consistent with the admixture derived from autosomal genetic data. To further dissect these estimates, we have analyzed our samples in the context of different demographic groups in the Americas.

conclusionsWe found that sex-biased admixture in African-derived populations is present throughout the Americas, with continual influence of European males, while Native American females contribute mainly to populations of the Caribbean and South America. The high non-European female contribution to the pool of European-derived populations is consistently characteristic of Iberian colonization. These data suggest that genomic data correlate well with historical records of colonization in the Americas.

Indexed as

Black or African AmericanBlack PeopleChromosomes, Human, YDNA, MitochondrialFemaleGene FrequencyGene PoolGenetic MarkersGenetics, PopulationHaplotypesHumansMalePhiladelphiaSenegalSex FactorsWhite PeopleDNA, MitochondrialGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID19946364
PMCPMC2776971
OpenAlexW2141550010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.