Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19946032›Full record

ReviewLupus2010

Review: Male systemic lupus erythematosus: a review of sex disparities in this disease.

L-J Lu, D J Wallace, M L Ishimori, R H Scofield, M H Weisman

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Lupus, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 80 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
80citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

80 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 179 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article

20 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

L-J LuCedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California 90048, USA.
D J Wallace
M L Ishimori
R H Scofield
M H Weisman
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center · USUniversity of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center · US

Funding

Tracking and Evaluation CoreU54GM104938 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA HLTH SCIENCES CTR · PI Janis E Campbell · 2013 to 2026
$68.2M
SNP Confirmation and High Throughput Genotyping CoreP30AR053483 · NIAMS · OKLAHOMA MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION · PI GUTHRIDGE, JOEL MARVIN · 2007 to 2017
$6.7M
The X Chromosome in Systemic Lupus ErythematosusR01AR053734 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA HLTH SCIENCES CTR · PI SCOFIELD, ROBERT HAL · 2006 to 2010
$1.4M
BLRD VA I01 BX001451NIAMS NIH HHS P30 AR053483NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR053734NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM104938
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although males with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) represent 4-22% of all SLE patients, it may not be appropriate that these cases should be subordinated to females with SLE in terms of most health-related issues. Over the past few decades, some distinctive features of male lupus have been observed with regard to genetic and environmental aspects of sex differences, clinical features, and outcome. In addition, recent insights into sex disparities in this disease have brought forth a few plausible and novel pathogenetic hypotheses. This review discusses these findings and sex disparities in SLE that appear to be especially noteworthy and pertinent to our understanding of male SLE.

Indexed as

AnimalsClinical Trials as TopicFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansLupus Erythematosus, SystemicMaleSex Factors

Identifiers

PMID19946032
PMCPMC7304291
OpenAlexW2116093915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.