Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19945742›Full record

ArticleGynecologic oncology2010

Use of a Symptom Index, CA125, and HE4 to predict ovarian cancer.

M Robyn Andersen, Barbara A Goff, Kimberly A Lowe, Nathalie Scholler, Lindsay Bergan, Charles W Drescher, Pamela Paley, Nicole Urban

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gynecologic oncology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 61 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01121640 nacompletednot on this map

A Randomized Controlled Trial Using Novel Markers to Predict Malignancy in Elevated-Risk Women

TypeinterventionalSponsorFred Hutchinson Cancer CenterRan2009 to 2015Enrolled854ConditionsEpithelial Ovarian CancerArmsCA125 assay on Abbott Architect i1000SR platform, HE4 assay on Architect i1000SR platform, Transvaginal Ultrasound
NCT02109367 completednot on this mapstarted 2014, after this paper: background citation

Diagnostic Utility of Culdocentesis in Patients With a Suspicious Adnexal Mass

TypeobservationalSponsorSouthern Illinois UniversityRan2014 to 2026Enrolled52ConditionsOvarian Cancer
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Designing early detection programs for ovarian cancer.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2011
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Exhausted and Senescent CD4Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The value of CA125 in predicting acute complicated colonic diverticulitis.International journal of colorectal disease · 2023
    Observational
  11. Nanobodies for the Early Detection of Ovarian Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Roles of Antimicrobial Peptides in Gynecological Cancers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

M Robyn AndersenMolecular Diagnostics Program, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington 98109-1024, USA. rander@fhcrc.org
Barbara A Goff
Kimberly A Lowe
Nathalie Scholler
Lindsay Bergan
Charles W Drescher
Pamela Paley
Nicole Urban

Funding

Vaccinating against IGFBP-2 to prevent ovarian cancer relapseP50CA083636 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI DRESCHER, CHARLES, URBAN, NICOLE DENISE · 1999 to 2015
$35.1M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA083636
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrior studies suggest that combining the Symptom Index (SI) with a serum HE4 test or a CA125 test may improve prediction of ovarian cancer. However, these three tests have not been evaluated in combination.

methodsA prospective case-control study design including 74 women with ovarian cancer and 137 healthy women was used with logistic regression analysis to evaluate the independent contributions of HE4 and CA125, and the SI to predict ovarian cancer status in a multivariate model. The diagnostic performance of various decision rules for combinations of these tests was assessed to evaluate potential use in predicting ovarian cancer.

resultsThe SI, HE4, and CA125 all made significant independent contributions to ovarian cancer prediction. A decision rule based on any one of the three tests being positive had a sensitivity of 95% with specificity of 80%. A rule based on any two of the three tests being positive had a sensitivity of 84% with a specificity of 98.5%. The SI alone had sensitivity of 64% with specificity of 88%. If the SI index is used to select women for CA125 and HE4 testing, specificity is 98.5% and sensitivity is 58% using the 2-of-3-positive decision rule.

conclusionsA 2-of-3-positive decision rule yields acceptable specificity, and higher sensitivity when all 3 tests are performed than when the SI is used to select women for screening by CA125 and HE4. If positive predictive value is a high priority, testing by CA125 and HE4 prior to imaging may be warranted for women with ovarian cancer symptoms.

Indexed as

beta-DefensinsCA-125 AntigenCase-Control StudiesEpididymal Secretory ProteinsFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMiddle AgedOvarian NeoplasmsPredictive Value of TestsProspective StudiesSeverity of Illness Indexbeta-DefensinsCA-125 AntigenDEFB126 protein, humanEpididymal Secretory Proteins

Identifiers

PMID19945742
PMCPMC2822097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.