Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19945681›Full record

ArticleHomeopathy : the journal of the Faculty of Homeopathy2009

Reporting experiments in homeopathic basic research (REHBaR)--a detailed guideline for authors.

B Stock-Schröer, H Albrecht, L Betti, P C Endler, K Linde, R Lüdtke, F Musial, R van Wijk, C Witt, S Baumgartner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Homeopathy : the journal of the Faculty of Homeopathy, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2017
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

B Stock-SchröerKarl and Veronica Carstens-Foundation, D-Essen, Germany.
H AlbrechtKarl and Veronica Carstens-Foundation, D-Essen, Germany.
L BettiDepartment of Agro-Environmental Science and Technology, Faculty of Agriculture, Bologna University, I-Bologna, Italy.
P C EndlerInteruniversity College for Health and Development, A-Graz, Austria.
K LindeInstitute of General Practice, Technical University, D-Munich, Germany.
R LüdtkeKarl and Veronica Carstens-Foundation, D-Essen, Germany.
F MusialDepartment of Complementary and Integrative Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, D-Essen, Germany.
R van WijkInternational Institute of Biophysics, D-Neuss, Germany.
C WittInstitute for Social Medicine, Epidemiology and Health Economics, Charité University Medical Center, D-Berlin, Germany.
S BaumgartnerInstitute of Complementary Medicine KIKOM, University of Bern, CH-Bern, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundReporting experiments in basic research in homeopathy is an important issue as comprehensive description of what exactly was done is required. So far, there is no guideline for authors available, unlike criteria catalogues common in clinical research.

methodsA Delphi Process was conducted, including a total of five rounds, three rounds of adjusting and phrasing plus two consensus conferences. European researchers who published experimental work within the last five years were involved.

resultsA checklist of 23 items was obtained and supplemented with detailed examples emphasizing what each item implies. Background, objectives and possible hypotheses should be given in the part 'introduction'. Special emphasis is put on the 'materials and methods' section, where a detailed description of chosen controls, object of investigation, experimental setup, replication, parameters, intervention, allocation, blinding, and statistical methods is required. The section 'results' should present sufficient details on analysed data, descriptive as well as inferential. Authors should discuss their results and give an interpretation in the context of current evidence.

conclusionA guideline for Reporting Experiments in Homeopathic Basic Research (REHBaR) was compiled to be applied by authors when preparing their manuscripts, and to be used by scientific journals in the reviewing process. Furthermore the guideline is a commitment to a certain minimum quality level needed in basic research, e.g. blinding and randomisation. Feedback is encouraged on applicability, strength and limitations of the list to enable future revisions.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchHomeopathyPublishingDelphi TechniqueGuidelines as TopicHumans

Identifiers

PMID19945681
PMCPMC8019360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.