ArticleAtencion primaria2010
[Patient involvement in decision making in primary care clinics: development of a measuring tool].
Article in Atencion primaria, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- [Questionnaires of person centered care in primary care. A systematic review].Atencion primaria · 2020Pooled it
- Evaluating the quality of shared decision making during the patient-carer encounter: a systematic review of tools.BMC research notes · 2016Pooled it
- Is the Scale for Measuring Motivational Interviewing Skills a valid and reliable instrument for measuring the primary care professionals motivational skills?: EVEM study protocol.BMC family practice · 2012Trial
- Patient participation in the discussions of options in Spanish primary care consultations.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2014Article
- [Making joint decisions in medicine: a difficult task].Atencion primaria · 2012Article
- [Patient opinion and perception of their participation in family medicine consultation decision making].Atencion primaria · 2012Article
- [Making shared decisions in the clinic: from need to reality].Atencion primaria · 2010Article
- The role of physician-patient communication in promoting patient-participatory decision making.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis work aims to explore to what extent Spanish primary care providers involve patients in decisions and describe the development of a suggested tool for assessing patient involvement in these settings.
designCross-sectional, development of a measurement tool.
settingPrimary care clinics.
participantsFamily doctors and residents.
interventionsBased on a review of the literature and the opinions of primary care doctors, a selection was made of items from a previous scale used to measure general communication skills (CICAA-Patient Centred) and new specific items were added to this to measure involvement. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: The involvement of patients in decision-making was evaluated initially with this tool in 31 different clinical visits and the scale was then reformulated. A pool of 161 interviews was used to complete the process. Some psychometric properties (reliability and internal consistency) were estimated for the different samples and stages of the process.
resultsSome degree of patient involvement was found in just 31 visits. Despite this, only in 18 of these (58%) was there some involvement in a discussion about more than one treatment option. The Cohen's kappa values of the CICAA-Decision scale were between 0.48 and 0.94. Cronbach's alpha was 0.60/0.51. The global Intra-class correlation coefficient was 0.96.
conclusionsThe levels of patient involvement were lower than expected. A simple question, such as that defined by one item in particular, and the CICAA-D scale, in general, could be useful to assess patient involvement in decision making in primary care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.