Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19944348›Full record

ArticleAnnals of epidemiology2009

Financial hardship and mortality among older adults using the 1996-2004 Health and Retirement Study.

Reginald D Tucker-Seeley, Yi Li, S V Subramanian, Glorian Sorensen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of epidemiology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Male Fertility as a Proxy for Health.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. COVID-19 Associated Suicidal Ideation in Older Adults: Two Case Reports With a Review of the Literature.The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry · 2021
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Reginald D Tucker-SeeleyDepartment of Society, Human Development, and Health, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA. retucker@hsph.harvard.edu
Yi Li
S V Subramanian
Glorian Sorensen

Funding

Asthma Disparities: Advancing Multilevel Causal ModelsK25HL081275 · NHLBI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (SCH OF PUBLIC HLTH) · PI SUBRAMANIAN, SANKARAN VENKATA · 2005 to 2009
$717k
NHLBI NIH HHS K25 HL081275
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe investigated the effect of financial hardship on mortality risk in a community-dwelling sample of adults 50 years of age and olderin the United States.

methodThe 1996 Health and Retirement Study cohorts were followed prospectively to 2004 (N = 8,377). Gender-stratified grouped Cox models were used to estimate the difference in the relative risk (RR) of mortality between a specific number of financial hardships (one, two, or three or more) and no hardships; and the predictive utility of each individual financial hardship for mortality during the follow-up period.

resultsGender-stratified models adjusted for demographics, socioeconomic characteristics, and functional limitations in 1996 showed that women reporting one (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.42; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.05-1.92) or three or more (HR = 1.60; 95% CI: 1.05-2.46) and men reporting two (HR = 1.80; 95% CI: 1.21-2.69) financial hardships had a substantially higher probability of mortality compared to those reporting no financial hardships. Individual financial hardships that predicted mortality in fully adjusted models for women included receiving Medicaid (HR = 2.23; 95% CI: 1.68-2.98) and for men receiving Medicaid (HR = 2.11; 95% CI: 1.57-2.84) and receiving food stamps (HR = 1.59; 95% CI: 1.09-2.33).

conclusionsThese findings suggest that over and above the influence of traditional measures of socioeconomic status, financial hardship exerts an influence on the risk of mortality among older adults and that the number and type of hardships important in predicting mortality may differ for men and women.

Indexed as

Health SurveysMortalityPovertyAgedFemaleGeriatric AssessmentHumansMaleMedicaidMiddle AgedProportional Hazards ModelsProspective StudiesRetirementRiskSex FactorsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID19944348
PMCPMC2835519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.