Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19943954›Full record

ArticleBMC physiology2009

Go contributes to olfactory reception in Drosophila melanogaster.

Abhishek Chatterjee, Gregg Roman, Paul E Hardin

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC physiology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Insects · 2022
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. The Two Main Olfactory Receptor Families inFrontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2018
    Review
  8. Tuning Insect Odorant Receptors.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The role of the coreceptor Orco in insect olfactory transduction.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2013
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Regulation of olfactory transduction in the orco channel.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2011
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Pheromone transduction in moths.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2010
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Abhishek ChatterjeeDepartment of Biology and Center for Biological Clock Research, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA. achatterjee@mail.bio.tamu.edu
Gregg Roman
Paul E Hardin
Texas A&M University · USUniversity of Houston · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSeven-transmembrane receptors typically mediate olfactory signal transduction by coupling to G-proteins. Although insect odorant receptors have seven transmembrane domains like G-protein coupled receptors, they have an inverted membrane topology and function as ligand-gated cation channels. Consequently, the involvement of cyclic nucleotides and G proteins in insect odor reception is controversial. Since the heterotrimeric Goalpha subunit is expressed in Drosophila olfactory receptor neurons, we reasoned that Go acts together with insect odorant receptor cation channels to mediate odor-induced physiological responses.

resultsTo test whether Go dependent signaling is involved in mediating olfactory responses in Drosophila, we analyzed electroantennogram and single-sensillum recording from flies that conditionally express pertussis toxin, a specific inhibitor of Go in Drosophila. Pertussis toxin expression in olfactory receptor neurons reversibly reduced the amplitude and hastened the termination of electroantennogram responses induced by ethyl acetate. The frequency of odor-induced spike firing from individual sensory neurons was also reduced by pertussis toxin. These results demonstrate that Go signaling is involved in increasing sensitivity of olfactory physiology in Drosophila. The effect of pertussis toxin was independent of odorant identity and intensity, indicating a generalized involvement of Go in olfactory reception.

conclusionThese results demonstrate that Go is required for maximal physiological responses to multiple odorants in Drosophila, and suggest that OR channel function and G-protein signaling are required for optimal physiological responses to odors.

Indexed as

Analysis of VarianceAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedDrosophila melanogasterElectrophysiologyGTP-Binding Protein alpha Subunits, Gi-GoOdorantsOlfactory PathwaysOlfactory Receptor NeuronsPertussis ToxinReceptors, OdorantSignal TransductionSmellGTP-Binding Protein alpha Subunits, Gi-GoPertussis ToxinReceptors, Odorant

Identifiers

PMID19943954
PMCPMC2789035
OpenAlexW2033832878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.