ArticleDrugs2009
Telavancin.
Article in Drugs, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Developments in Glycopeptide Antibiotics.ACS infectious diseases · 2018Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Telavancin is the first available lipoglycopeptide antibacterial agent. It is active against Gram-positive bacteria, including meticillin/oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains associated with complicated skin and skin structure infections (cSSSIs). In randomized, double-blind trials, intravenous telavancin 10 mg/kg once daily (administered as a 1-hour infusion) was effective in the treatment of adult patients with cSSSIs, including those with infections caused by MRSA, as shown by clinical cure rates in clinically evaluable, all-treated and microbiologically evaluable populations at the test-of-cure (TOC) visit. Telavancin 10 mg/kg once daily was noninferior to intravenous vancomycin 1 g every 12 hours, with clinical cure rates of 88% versus 87% at the TOC visit in pooled data from the clinically evaluable population (n = 1489) of two phase III trials. Pooled clinical cure rates in telavancin recipients at the TOC visit were also not significantly different from those in vancomycin recipients in the all-treated or microbiologically evaluable populations, including microbiologically evaluable subgroups with baseline infections caused by MRSA, meticillin-susceptible S. aureus or other Gram-positive pathogens. Telavancin was generally well tolerated in patients with cSSSIs, with most adverse events being of mild or moderate severity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.