ArticleNature reviews. Clinical oncology2009
Hematology: dasatinib regimens for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia.
Article in Nature reviews. Clinical oncology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although imatinib mesylate therapy has dramatically improved the prognosis of patients in the advanced phases of chronic myeloid leukemia, room for improvement remains. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors are undergoing evaluation as second-line therapy for patients with imatinib-resistant disease. Kantarjian et al. recently demonstrated that once-daily dasatinib 140 mg is well tolerated and achieves a high response rate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
19942922What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.