ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2010
Extraction and comparison of gene expression patterns from 2D RNA in situ hybridization images.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Formalizing Phenotypes of Regeneration.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022Article
- New methods for computational decomposition of whole-mount in situ images enable effective curation of a large, highly redundant collection of Xenopus images.PLoS computational biology · 2018Article
- A geometric method for contour extraction of Drosophila embryos.BMC systems biology · 2017Article
- Stability-driven nonnegative matrix factorization to interpret spatial gene expression and build local gene networks.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016Article
- Image-level and group-level models for Drosophila gene expression pattern annotation.BMC bioinformatics · 2013Article
- A methodology to infer gene networks from spatial patterns of expression--an application to fluorescence in situ hybridization images.Molecular bioSystems · 2013Article
- Automated annotation of gene expression image sequences via non-parametric factor analysis and conditional random fields.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2013Article
- A high-fidelity cell lineage tracing method for obtaining systematic spatiotemporal gene expression patterns in Caenorhabditis elegans.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2013Article
- GINI: from ISH images to gene interaction networks.PLoS computational biology · 2013Article
- Learning sparse representations for fruit-fly gene expression pattern image annotation and retrieval.BMC bioinformatics · 2012Article
- Localizing genes to cerebellar layers by classifying ISH images.PLoS computational biology · 2012Article
- Medium-throughput processing of whole mount in situ hybridisation experiments into gene expression domains.PloS one · 2012Article
- Automatic annotation of spatial expression patterns via sparse Bayesian factor models.PLoS computational biology · 2011Article
- Automatically identifying and annotating mouse embryo gene expression patterns.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationRecent advancements in high-throughput imaging have created new large datasets with tens of thousands of gene expression images. Methods for capturing these spatial and/or temporal expression patterns include in situ hybridization or fluorescent reporter constructs or tags, and results are still frequently assessed by subjective qualitative comparisons. In order to deal with available large datasets, fully automated analysis methods must be developed to properly normalize and model spatial expression patterns.
resultsWe have developed image segmentation and registration methods to identify and extract spatial gene expression patterns from RNA in situ hybridization experiments of Drosophila embryos. These methods allow us to normalize and extract expression information for 78,621 images from 3724 genes across six time stages. The similarity between gene expression patterns is computed using four scoring metrics: mean squared error, Haar wavelet distance, mutual information and spatial mutual information (SMI). We additionally propose a strategy to calculate the significance of the similarity between two expression images, by generating surrogate datasets with similar spatial expression patterns using a Monte Carlo swap sampler. On data from an early development time stage, we show that SMI provides the most biologically relevant metric of comparison, and that our significance testing generalizes metrics to achieve similar performance. We exemplify the application of spatial metrics on the well-known Drosophila segmentation network. AVAILABILITY: A Java webstart application to register and compare patterns, as well as all source code, are available from: http://tools.genome.duke.edu/generegulation/image_analysis/insitu CONTACT: uwe.ohler@duke.edu SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.