Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19942166›Full record

ReviewBest practice & research. Clinical gastroenterology2009

Colon cancer and the elderly: from screening to treatment in management of GI disease in the elderly.

Peter R Holt, Peter Kozuch, Seetal Mewar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Best practice & research. Clinical gastroenterology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Journal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The Role of SOX Transcription Factors in Ageing and Age-Related Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Unrelated Death After Colorectal Cancer Screening: Implications for Improving Colonoscopy Referrals.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Peter R HoltThe Rockefeller University, 1230 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA. holtp@rockefeller.edu
Peter Kozuch
Seetal Mewar
Mount Sinai Beth Israel · USRockefeller University · US

Funding

TRANSFORMING TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE AND EDUCATION TO BENEFIT HUMAN HEALTHUL1RR024143 · NCRR · ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY · PI COLLER, BARRY · 2006 to 2011
$49.1M
Transforming Translational Science and Education to Benefit Human HealthUL1TR000043 · NCATS · ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY · PI COLLER, BARRY · 2012 to 2015
$26.8M
MOLECULAR-NUTRIENT INTERACTIONS IN INTESTINAL CANCERU54CA100926 · NCI · MONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER (BRONX, NY) · PI AUGENLICHT, LEONARD H · 2003 to 2008
$9.7M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000043NCI NIH HHS U54 CA100926NCI NIH HHS U54CA100926NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024143NCRR NIH HHS UL1RR024143
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colorectal cancer is one of the commonest tumours in the Westernized world affecting mainly the elderly. This neoplasm in older individuals occurs more often in the right colon and grows more rapidly than in the young, often shows a mucinous histology and mismatch repair gene changes. Effective screening permits discovery of colorectal cancer at an early highly treatable stage and allows for detection and removal of premalignant colorectal adenomas. Screening methods that focus on cancer detection use fecal assays for the presence of blood or altered DNA, those for detection of adenomas (and early cancer) use endoscopic or computerised radiologic techniques. Broad use of screening methods has lowered colorectal cancer development by about 50%. In addition, prevention of the earliest stage of colon carcinogenesis has been shown to be effective in small prospective studies and epidemiologic surveys but have not been employed in the general population. Since 1996 the chemotherapeutic armamentarium for metastatic colorectal cancer has grown beyond 5-fluorouracil to include an oral 5-fluorouracil prodrug, capecitabine as well as irinotecan and oxaliplatin. Three targeted monoclonal antibodies (Moabs), bevacizumab (an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor Moab) and cetuximab/panitumumab, both anti-epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors, have also earned regulatory approval. Most stage IV patients are treated with all of these drugs over 2 or 3 sequential lines of palliative chemotherapy and attain median survivals approaching 24 months. Lastly, adjuvant oxaliplatin plus 5-fluorouracil for high risk resected stage II and stage III colon cancer patient has led to substantial improvement in cure rates. With appropriate care of age associated comorbidities these treatment modalities are feasible and effective in the geriatric population.

Indexed as

AgingColectomyMass ScreeningAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsChemotherapy, AdjuvantColorectal NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerHealth Services for the AgedHumansMiddle AgedPatient SelectionPractice Guidelines as TopicPredictive Value of Tests

Identifiers

PMID19942166
PMCPMC3742312
OpenAlexW2089689805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.