Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19941058›Full record

Trial reportApplied psychophysiology and biofeedback2010

Low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) affects event-related potential measures of novelty processing in autism.

Estate Sokhadze, Joshua Baruth, Allan Tasman, Mehreen Mansoor, Rajesh Ramaswamy, Lonnie Sears, Grace Mathai, Ayman El-Baz, Manuel F Casanova

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Applied psychophysiology and biofeedback, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 115 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. [Effects of low frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on Electroencephalograph rhythm of children with autism].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2018
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. The use of noninvasive brain stimulation techniques in autism spectrum disorder.Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Looking Back at the Next 40 Years of ASD Neuroscience Research.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Estate SokhadzeDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY, 40292, USA. tato.sokhadze@louisville.edu
Joshua Baruth
Allan Tasman
Mehreen Mansoor
Rajesh Ramaswamy
Lonnie Sears
Grace Mathai
Ayman El-Baz
Manuel F Casanova
University of Louisville · US

Funding

Building a Selective Inhibitory Control Tone in Autism: An rTMS StudyR01MH086784 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI CASANOVA, MANUEL F · 2009 to 2012
$884k
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH086784PHS HHS R01 EUREKA GRANT
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In our previous study on individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) (Sokhadze et al., Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback 34:37-51, 2009a) we reported abnormalities in the attention-orienting frontal event-related potentials (ERP) and the sustained-attention centro-parietal ERPs in a visual oddball experiment. These results suggest that individuals with autism over-process information needed for the successful differentiation of target and novel stimuli. In the present study we examine the effects of low-frequency, repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) on novelty processing as well as behavior and social functioning in 13 individuals with ASD. Our hypothesis was that low-frequency rTMS application to dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLFPC) would result in an alteration of the cortical excitatory/inhibitory balance through the activation of inhibitory GABAergic double bouquet interneurons. We expected to find post-TMS differences in amplitude and latency of early and late ERP components. The results of our current study validate the use of low-frequency rTMS as a modulatory tool that altered the disrupted ratio of cortical excitation to inhibition in autism. After rTMS the parieto-occipital P50 amplitude decreased to novel distracters but not to targets; also the amplitude and latency to targets increased for the frontal P50 while decreasing to non-target stimuli. Low-frequency rTMS minimized early cortical responses to irrelevant stimuli and increased responses to relevant stimuli. Improved selectivity in early cortical responses lead to better stimulus differentiation at later-stage responses as was made evident by our P3b and P3a component findings. These results indicate a significant change in early, middle-latency and late ERP components at the frontal, centro-parietal, and parieto-occipital regions of interest in response to target and distracter stimuli as a result of rTMS treatment. Overall, our preliminary results show that rTMS may prove to be an important research tool or treatment modality in addressing the stimulus hypersensitivity characteristic of autism spectrum disorders.

Indexed as

Transcranial Magnetic StimulationAdolescentAdultAutistic DisorderBehaviorCerebral CortexChildElectroencephalographyEvoked PotentialsFemaleHumansHyperkinesisInterneuronsMaleMental ProcessesPhotic Stimulation

Identifiers

PMID19941058
PMCPMC2876218
OpenAlexW2081269439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.