Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19941020›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2010

Evaluation of the combination of the NucliSENS easyMAG and the EasyQ applications for the detection of Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Chlamydia pneumoniae in respiratory tract specimens.

E Béssède, H Renaudin, M Clerc, B de Barbeyrac, C Bébéar, S Pereyre

Abstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Characterization ofNew microbes and new infections · 2017
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

E BéssèdeLaboratoire de Bactériologie, CHU de Bordeaux, 33076 Bordeaux cedex, France.
H Renaudin
M Clerc
B de Barbeyrac
C Bébéar
S Pereyre

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Chlamydia pneumoniae are respiratory tract pathogens frequently involved in community-acquired pneumonia, but are fastidious microorganisms. Their direct detection mainly requires molecular amplification techniques. A nucleic acid extraction system, NucliSENS easyMAG, and a real-time nucleic acid sequence-based amplification (NASBA) technique, NucliSENS EasyQ, were recently developed by bioMérieux to detect both bacteria. The aim of our study was to compare the easyMAG/EasyQ combination with our in-house combination, MagNA Pure extraction (Roche) and real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR), to detect both bacteria in respiratory tract specimens. The analytical specificities of both combinations were similar. A higher analytical sensitivity was found for C. pneumoniae using the easyMAG/EasyQ combination, since the easyMAG/EasyQ system detected nucleic acid extracts 10(6) times more diluted than the in-house combination. Both combinations were equivalent when detecting M. pneumoniae in positive respiratory tract samples. Finally, the easyMAG/EasyQ combination is a potential useful tool for the detection of both bacteria regarding sensitivity, specificity, monitoring, and standardization of the procedure.

Indexed as

Bacteriological TechniquesBody FluidsChlamydophila InfectionsChlamydophila pneumoniaeHumansMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesMycoplasma pneumoniaeNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesPneumonia, MycoplasmaReagent Kits, DiagnosticRespiratory SystemSensitivity and SpecificityReagent Kits, Diagnostic

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.