Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19940855›Full record

ArticleJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2010

A statewide quality improvement collaborative to reduce neonatal central line-associated blood stream infections.

D D Wirtschafter, J Pettit, P Kurtin, M Dalsey, K Chance, H W Morrow, M Seid, T L Byczkowski, T P Huber, J M Milstein and 3 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Advancements in neonatology through quality improvement.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2022
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Contextual factors influencing the implementation of the obstetrics hemorrhage initiative in Florida.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2017
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Reduction of central line-associated bloodstream infection rates in a neonatal intensive care unit after implementation of a multidisciplinary evidence-based quality improvement collaborative: A four-year surveillance.The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

D D WirtschafterDavid D Wirtschafter, MD, Inc., Valley Village, CA, USA. david.wirtschafter@juno.com
J Pettit
P Kurtin
M Dalsey
K Chance
H W Morrow
M Seid
T L Byczkowski
T P Huber
J M Milstein
S M Bowles
S Fichera
S Kloman

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objective of this study was to reduce central line-associated blood stream infections (CLABSIs) among 13 collaborating regional neonatal intensive care units by 25%. We tested the hypothesis that change could be attributed to the quality improvement collaborative by testing for 'special cause' variation. STUDY

designOur prevention project included five features: (1) leadership commitment, (2) potentially best practices, (3) collaborative processes, (4) audit and feedback tools and (5) quality improvement techniques. Baseline (1 January 2006 to 30 August 2006) data were compared with the intervention (1 September 2006 to 30 June 2007) and post-intervention (1 July 2007 to 30 December 2007) periods and analyzed using statistical process control (SPC) methods.

resultWe detected special cause variation, suggesting that the collaborative was associated with reduced infection rates, from 4.32 to 3.22 per 1000 line days (a 25% decrease) when comparing the baseline with the follow-up period.

conclusionThe collaborative's process was associated with fewer infections. SPC suggested that systematic changes occurred. The remaining challenges include sustaining or even further reducing the infection rate.

Indexed as

Intensive Care Units, NeonatalOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CareBacteremiaCaliforniaCatheterization, Central VenousCross InfectionHand DisinfectionHumansInfant, NewbornQuality Assurance, Health Care

Identifiers

PMID19940855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.