Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19939956›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2010

Neuron-specific cholinergic modulation of a forebrain song control nucleus.

Stephen D Shea, Henner Koch, Daniel Baleckaitis, Jan-Marino Ramirez, Daniel Margoliash

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Intrinsic plasticity and birdsong learning.Neurobiology of learning and memory · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Stephen D SheaCommittee on Neurobiology and 2Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA. sshea@cshl.edu
Henner Koch
Daniel Baleckaitis
Jan-Marino Ramirez
Daniel Margoliash
University of Chicago · USInstitute of Neurobiology · BG

Funding

NEUROPHYSIOLOGY OF SENSORIMOTOR LEARNINGR01MH059831 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI MARGOLIASH, DANIEL · 1999 to 2009
$2.9M
Neuromodulation of auditory inputF31DC005098 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI SHEA, STEPHEN D · 2001 to 2002
$58k
NIDCD NIH HHS DC-05098NIMH NIH HHS MH-59831
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cholinergic activation profoundly affects vertebrate forebrain networks, but pathway, cell type, and modality specificity remain poorly understood. Here we investigated cell-specific cholinergic modulation of neurons in the zebra finch forebrain song control nucleus HVC using in vitro whole cell recordings. The HVC contains projection neurons that exclusively project to either another song motor nucleus RA (robust nucleus of the arcopallium) (HVC-RAn) or the basal ganglia Area X (HVC-Xn) and these populations are synaptically coupled by a network of GABAergic interneurons. Among HVC-RAn, we observed two physiologically distinct classes that fire either phasically or tonically to injected current. Muscarine excited phasic HVC-RAn and most HVC-Xn. Effects were observed under conditions of blockade of fast synaptic transmission and were reversed by atropine. In contrast, unlike what is commonly observed in mammalian systems, HVC interneurons were inhibited by muscarine and these effects were reversed by atropine. Thus cholinergic modulation reconfigures the HVC network in a more complex fashion than that implied by monolithic "gating." The two projection pathways are decoupled through suppression of the inhibitory network that links them, whereas each is simultaneously predominantly excited. We speculate that fluctuating cholinergic tone in HVC could modulate the interaction of song motor commands with basal ganglia circuitry associated with song perception and modification. Furthermore, if the in vitro distinction between RA-projecting neurons that we observed is also present in vivo, then the song system motor pathway exhibits greater physiological diversity than has been commonly assumed.

Indexed as

AcetylcholineAction PotentialsAnimalsCholinergic FibersFinchesMaleNerve NetNeuronal PlasticityNeuronsProsencephalonVocalization, AnimalAcetylcholine

Identifiers

PMID19939956
PMCPMC2822690
OpenAlexW2146171632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.