Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19939941›Full record

ReviewBriefings in bioinformatics2010

Detection call algorithms for high-throughput gene expression microarray data.

Kellie J Archer, Sarah E Reese

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Systematic identification of 3'-UTR regulatory elements in activity-dependent mRNA stability in hippocampal neurons.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2014
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Rab5 and Rab4 regulate axon elongation in the Xenopus visual system.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2014
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kellie J ArcherDepartment of Biostatistics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298-0032, USA. kjarcher@vcu.edu
Sarah E Reese

Funding

Integration of Mixtures Toxicology, Toxicogenomics, and StatisticsT32ES007334 · NIEHS · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI WHEELER, DAVID CHARLES · 2002 to 2018
$2.5M
Informatic tools for predicting an ordinal response for high-dimensional dataR01LM011169 · NLM · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI ARCHER, KELLIE J. · 2012 to 2015
$944k
Recursive partitioning and ensemble methods for classifying an ordinal responseR03LM009347 · NLM · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI ARCHER, KELLIE J. · 2008 to 2010
$230k
NIEHS NIH HHS T32 ES007334NLM NIH HHS R01 LM011169NLM NIH HHS R03 LM009347
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extensive methodological research has been conducted to improve gene expression summary methods. However, in addition to quantitative gene expression summaries, most platforms, including all those examined in the MicroArray Quality Control project, provide a qualitative detection call result for each gene on the platform. These detection call algorithms are intended to render an assessment of whether or not each transcript is reliably measured. In this paper, we review uses of these qualitative detection call results in the analysis of microarray data. We also review the detection call algorithms for two widely used gene expression microarray platforms, Affymetrix GeneChips and Illumina BeadArrays, and more clearly formalize the mathematical notation for the Illumina BeadArray detection call algorithm. Both algorithms result in a P-value which is then used for determining the qualitative detection calls. We examined the performance of these detection call algorithms and default parameters by applying the methods to two spike-in datasets. We show that the default parameters for qualitative detection calls yield few absent calls for high spike-in concentrations. When genes of interest are expected to be present at very low concentrations, spike-in datasets can be useful for appropriately adjusting the tuning parameters for qualitative detection calls.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDatabases, GeneticGene Expression ProfilingHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisSequence Analysis, DNA

Identifiers

PMID19939941
PMCPMC4110453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.