Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19937755›Full record

ArticleStem cells (Dayton, Ohio)2010

Gliosarcoma stem cells undergo glial and mesenchymal differentiation in vivo.

Ana C deCarvalho, Kevin Nelson, Nancy Lemke, Norman L Lehman, Ali S Arbab, Steven Kalkanis, Tom Mikkelsen

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stem cells (Dayton, Ohio), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. A novel HPβCD-Cu(DDC)Scientific reports · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The impact of initial tumor microenvironment on imaging phenotype.Cancer treatment and research communications · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ana C deCarvalhoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan 48202-2689, USA. ana@neuro.hfh.edu
Kevin Nelson
Nancy Lemke
Norman L Lehman
Ali S Arbab
Steven Kalkanis
Tom Mikkelsen
Henry Ford Hospital · US

Funding

Cellular MRI in Glioma and Radiation NecrosisR01CA122031 · NCI · HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM · PI ARBAB, ALI SYED · 2007 to 2010
$992k
Control of Genomic Stability by Emil and SecruinK08NS045077 · NINDS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI LEHMAN, NORMAN · 2003 to 2007
$843k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA122031NCI NIH HHS R01CA122031NINDS NIH HHS K08 NS045077
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer stem cells (CSCs) are characterized by their self-renewing potential and by their ability to differentiate and phenocopy the original tumor in orthotopic xenografts. Long-term propagation of glioblastoma (GBM) cells in serum-containing medium results in loss of the CSCs and outgrowth of cells genetically and biologically divergent from the parental tumors. In contrast, the use of a neurosphere assay, a serum-free culture for selection, and propagation of central nervous system-derived stem cells allows the selection of a subpopulation containing CSCs. Gliosarcoma (GS), a morphological variant comprising approximately 2% of GBMs, present a biphasic growth pattern, composed of glial and metaplastic mesenchymal components. To assess whether the neurosphere assay would allow the amplification of a subpopulation of cells with "gliosarcoma stem cell" properties, capable of propagating both components of this malignancy, we have generated neurospheres and serum cultures from primary GS and GBM surgical specimens. Neurosphere cultures from GBM and GS samples expressed neural stem cell markers Sox2, Musashi1, and Nestin. In contrast to the GBM neurosphere lines, the GS neurospheres were negative for the stem cell marker CD133. All neurosphere lines generated high-grade invasive orthotopic tumor xenografts, with histological features strikingly similar to the parental tumors, demonstrating that these cultures indeed are enriched in CSCs. Remarkably, low-passage GS serum cultures retained the expression of stem cell markers, the ability to form neurospheres, and tumorigenicity. The GS experimental tumors phenocopied the parental tumor, exhibiting biphasic glial and mesenchymal components, constituting a clinically relevant model to investigate mesenchymal differentiation in GBMs.

Indexed as

AC133 AntigenAnimalsAntigens, CDBlotting, WesternCell DifferentiationGlioblastomaGliosarcomaGlycoproteinsHumansImmunohistochemistryIntermediate Filament ProteinsIn Vitro TechniquesMagnetic Resonance ImagingMesenchymal Stem CellsNeoplastic Stem CellsNerve Tissue ProteinsAC133 AntigenAntigens, CDGlycoproteinsIntermediate Filament ProteinsMSI1 protein, humanNerve Tissue ProteinsNES protein, humanNes protein, ratNestinPeptidesPROM1 protein, humanProm1 protein, ratRNA-Binding ProteinsSOX2 protein, humanSOXB1 Transcription Factors

Identifiers

PMID19937755
PMCPMC2873790
OpenAlexW2019471510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.