Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19937658›Full record

ArticleProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2010

A galaxy of folds.

Vikram Alva, Michael Remmert, Andreas Biegert, Andrei N Lupas, Johannes Söding

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Contrastive learning unites sequence and structure in a global representation of protein space.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. The Ascent of Miniproteins.Biochemistry · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Protein Fold Usages in Ribosomes: Another Glance to the Past.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Similar protein segments shared between domains of different evolutionary lineages.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Mechanisms of protein evolution.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Evolution, folding, and design of TIM barrels and related proteins.Current opinion in structural biology · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Vikram AlvaDepartment of Protein Evolution, Max-Planck-Institute for Developmental Biology, Tübingen 72076, Germany.
Michael Remmert
Andreas Biegert
Andrei N Lupas
Johannes Söding
Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many protein classification systems capture homologous relationships by grouping domains into families and superfamilies on the basis of sequence similarity. Superfamilies with similar 3D structures are further grouped into folds. In the absence of discernable sequence similarity, these structural similarities were long thought to have originated independently, by convergent evolution. However, the growth of databases and advances in sequence comparison methods have led to the discovery of many distant evolutionary relationships that transcend the boundaries of superfamilies and folds. To investigate the contributions of convergent versus divergent evolution in the origin of protein folds, we clustered representative domains of known structure by their sequence similarity, treating them as point masses in a virtual 2D space which attract or repel each other depending on their pairwise sequence similarities. As expected, families in the same superfamily form tight clusters. But often, superfamilies of the same fold are linked with each other, suggesting that the entire fold evolved from an ancient prototype. Strikingly, some links connect superfamilies with different folds. They arise from modular peptide fragments of between 20 and 40 residues that co-occur in the connected folds in disparate structural contexts. These may be descendants of an ancestral pool of peptide modules that evolved as cofactors in the RNA world and from which the first folded proteins arose by amplification and recombination. Our galaxy of folds summarizes, in a single image, most known and many yet undescribed homologous relationships between protein superfamilies, providing new insights into the evolution of protein domains.

Indexed as

Protein FoldingCluster AnalysisComputational BiologyDatabases, ProteinProteinsSequence Homology, Amino AcidProteins

Identifiers

PMID19937658
PMCPMC2817847
OpenAlexW1985007883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.