Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19937350›Full record

ArticlePediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany)2010

Adherence to waiting-time targets for pediatric nephrology clinic referrals.

Maria Radina, Ajay P Sharma, Abeer Yasin, Guido Filler

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Late referrals of pediatric patients with elevated blood pressure.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2020
    Article
  2. Article
  3. The need for ongoing monitoring of adherence to access targets.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Maria RadinaDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Nephrology, Children's Hospital, London Health Science Centre, University of Western Ontario, 800 Commissioners Road East, London, ON, Canada.
Ajay P Sharma
Abeer Yasin
Guido Filler
Western University · CALondon Health Sciences Centre · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Waiting times for specialist consultation have not been adequately studied, especially in the pediatric population. The aim of this study was to determine the extent to which pediatric nephrology subspecialty clinic referral waiting times are adhered to with regard to previously determined access targets. Referrals to the pediatric nephrology clinics at Children's Hospital, London, Ontario, Canada, received between October 2007 and November 2008 were retrospectively analyzed. Appointment schedule was allotted by a nephrologist based on the patient's presenting complaint, reported in the referral, in accordance with the previously determined access targets. Adherence to access targets was assessed by the actual clinic visit. There were a total of 250 referrals during the timeframe studied. The median waiting time was 73 (range 0-193) days. Overall, 64% (159/250) of patients met their access target. The median time that patients waited over their access target was 6 (range 0-78) days. Of the patients who did not meet their access targets, 31% (28/91) exceeded their target by 20% or more. Office handling was a component for patients with access target <1 week, whereas availability of clinic space was the main reason for nonadherence to access targets.

Indexed as

Appointments and SchedulesWaiting ListsAdolescentCanadaChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansInfantKidney DiseasesMaleNephrologyPediatricsReferral and ConsultationRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID19937350
OpenAlexW2044958768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.