Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19937220›Full record

ArticleFolia microbiologica2009

Eradication of Enterococcus faecalis by phage therapy in chronic bacterial prostatitis--case report.

S Letkiewicz, R Miedzybrodzki, W Fortuna, B Weber-Dabrowska, A Górski

Abstract readCase Reports
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Folia microbiologica, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 101 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. [Potential of bacteriophage therapy in Germany: evidence and clinical relevance].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2025
    Review
  6. Insights into ecology, pathogenesis, and biofilm formation ofMicrobiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Enterococcal Phages: Food and Health Applications.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  10. A Century of Clinical Use of Phages: A Literature Review.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  11. Viruses · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Vancomycin Resistance inMicroorganisms · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Can Bacteriophages Replace Antibiotics?Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Bacteriophage-Resistant Mutant ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

S LetkiewiczUrological and Andrological Clinic UROGEN, 42-600, Tarnowskie Góry, Poland. letkiewicz1@tlen.pl
R Miedzybrodzki
W Fortuna
B Weber-Dabrowska
A Górski
Ludwik Hirszfeld Institute of Immunology and Experimental Therapy · PLHologic (Germany) · DEPolish Academy of Sciences · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The treatment of three patients suffering from chronic bacterial prostatitis who were qualified for an experimental phage therapy protocol managed at the Phage Therapy Unit in Wrocław is described. They had previously been treated unsuccessfully with long-term targeted antibiotics, autovaccines, and laser biostimulation. Rectal application of phage lysates targeted against Enterococcus faecalis cultured from the prostatic fluid gave encouraging results regarding bacterial eradication, abatement of clinical symptoms of prostatitis, and lack of early disease recurrence.

Indexed as

Biological TherapyAdultBacteriophagesEnterococcus faecalisGram-Positive Bacterial InfectionsHumansMaleProstatitis

Identifiers

PMID19937220
OpenAlexW2072961801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.