ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2010
Outcome based on management for duodenal adenomas: sporadic versus familial disease.
Article in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.
- Japanese society for cancer of the colon and rectum (JSCCR) guidelines 2024 for the clinical practice of hereditary colorectal cancer.International journal of clinical oncology · 2026Guideline
- Small Intestine Tumors: Diagnostic Role of Multiparametric Ultrasound.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Article
- Multi-Institutional Analysis of Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Nonfamilial Periampullary Adenoma: A Novel Risk Score to Guide Shared Decision-Making.Journal of the American College of Surgeons · 2025Article
- Endoscopic Resection for Superficial Non-Ampullary Duodenal Epithelial Tumors.Gut and liver · 2025Review
- Case Report: A rare case of a giant sporadic non-ampullary duodenal adenoma that was safely and effectively resected using hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Endoscopic diagnosis and treatment of superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors: A review.Journal of translational internal medicine · 2023Article
- Endoscopic resection of non-ampullary duodenal adenomas: Is cold snaring the promised land?World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2023Review
- Role of Endoscopy in Management of Upper Gastrointestinal Cancers.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Efficacy of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in familial adenomatous polyposis patients after duodenectomy.DEN open · 2022Article
- Endoscopic management of non-ampullary duodenal adenomas.Endoscopy international open · 2022Review
- Long-Term Outcomes of Pancreas-Sparing Duodenectomy for Duodenal Polyposis in Familial Adenomatous Polyposis Syndrome.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2021Article
- Upper gastrointestinal neoplasia in familial adenomatous polyposis: prevalence, endoscopic features and management.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2019Article
- Gene Expression Changes Accompanying the Duodenal Adenoma-Carcinoma Sequence in Familial Adenomatous Polyposis.Clinical and translational gastroenterology · 2019Article
- Clinical and endoscopic findings to assist the early detection of duodenal adenoma and adenocarcinoma.United European gastroenterology journal · 2019Article
- Advanced duodenal neoplasia and carcinoma in familial adenomatous polyposis: outcomes of surgical management.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2017Article
- The different pathogeneses of sporadic adenoma and adenocarcinoma in non-ampullary lesions of the proximal and distal duodenum.Oncotarget · 2017Article
- Chemoprevention of hereditary colon cancers: time for new strategies.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2016Review
- A case of carcinoma of the papilla of Vater in a young man after subtotal colectomy for familial adenomatous polyposis.World journal of surgical oncology · 2016Article
- Nonampullary duodenal adenoma: Current understanding of its diagnosis, pathogenesis, and clinical management.World journal of gastroenterology · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionManagement and outcomes for duodenal adenomas may vary based on etiology, familial versus sporadic. We reviewed the records of patients managed at our institution for duodenal adenomatous polyps for the 20-year period ending July 2006. DISCUSSION: Methods of polyp resection (endoscopic, local surgical resection, or definitive surgical resection) within both sporadic and familial patient groups were compared. Patients with known cancer were excluded. Two hundred seventy-eight patients with duodenal polyps were followed during this time period: 110 patients (39.6%) with sporadic polyps and 168 (60.4%) with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). Sporadic patients presented at a mean age of 66.5 years. Endoscopic resection was attempted in 44 patients (40%) with morbidity in 9% and local recurrence rate of 52% with a mean follow-up of 43 months. Surgical resection was performed in 46 patients (42%): 27 by definitive resection and local resection in 19. At a mean follow-up of 41 months, there were no local recurrences in the patients treated by definitive resection and six recurrences (32%) after local resection. Morbidity was 39%. There was a significant difference in local recurrence when comparing definitive resection to both endoscopic and local resection (p<0.001, p=0.002, respectively), but no significant difference between endoscopic and local excision (p=0.13). Cancer was discovered in the surgical specimens of 11 patients (24%) with benign preoperative biopsies. FAP patients began surveillance at a mean age of 39.5 years, and mean surveillance duration was 100 months. Endoscopic resection/ablation was attempted in 40 patients (24%) with a morbidity of 7.5%. With a mean follow-up of 77.5 months, the local recurrence rate was 72.5%. Surgical resection was performed in with local recurrence rates of 9% and 100%, respectively. Surgical morbidity was 48%. Local recurrence was significantly lower following definitive resection compared to endoscopic or local resection (p<0.001), but there was no difference in local recurrence between the latter two groups (p=0.29). Four patients (8%) undergoing surgery were discovered to have invasive cancer despite benign endoscopic biopsies. In summary, endoscopic and local surgical management for both sporadic and familial duodenal polyps are associated with a high rate of local recurrence. Definitive resection in the form of pancreaticoduodenectomy, pancreas-sparing duodenectomy, or segmental duodenectomy offers the best chance for polyp eradication and prevention of carcinoma, regardless of polyp etiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.