Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19937089›Full record

Trial reportJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2010

The diagnostic performance of APC-PCI complex determination compared to D-dimer in the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis.

Johan L Elf, Karin Strandberg, Peter J Svensson

Abstract readClinical TrialComparative StudyMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Evaluation of Expression Level of Apolipoprotein M as a Diagnostic Marker for Primary Venous Thromboembolism.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis · 2018
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Johan L ElfDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Lund University, Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden. johan.elf@skane.se
Karin Strandberg
Peter J Svensson
Lund University · SESkåne University Hospital · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledD-dimer testing is widely used as part of the diagnostic algorithm for the exclusion of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) but is considered of limited in value for ruling DVT in. Since D-dimers are poorly defined, there is no standardization of the assays and this makes reliable comparisons between clinical studies difficult. We report on a performance evaluation of a new marker of activated coagulation (Activated Protein-C in complex with Protein-C inhibitor, APC-PCI complex) compared to two quantitative D-dimer assays (Vidas D-dimer Exclusion and Autodimer). The post-hoc comparison was made on 350 frozen plasma samples from consecutive outpatients suspected of DVT in a multicenter management study including clinical probability score, D-dimer testing, venous ultrasound and contrast venography as part of the diagnostic algorithm.

resultsThe APC-PCI complex performed inferior to the D-dimer assays in terms of sensitivity: 74 vs. >93%, negative predictive value: 91 vs. >96% and area under the curve: 0.82 vs. 0.9, but showed a significantly higher specificity: 80 vs. 40-60%. Specificity for the APC-PCI complex did not decrease with higher clinical probability score and the positive predictive value was significantly higher than that of the D-dimer assays in the intermediate/high probability cohort (66 vs. <52%). In this probability cohort, high levels of the APC-PCI complex and to a lesser extent, D-dimers, can give positive predictive values of >90% in up to 20% of the patients which indicates important clinical implications. However, for the exclusion of DVT at the pre-specified cut-off level, the APC-PCI complex perform inferior to the D-dimer assays in this study.

Indexed as

AdultFemaleFibrin Fibrinogen Degradation ProductsFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMultiprotein ComplexesPhlebographyProtein CProtein C InhibitorSensitivity and SpecificityUltrasonographyVenous ThrombosisFibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Productsfibrin fragment DMultiprotein ComplexesProtein CProtein C Inhibitor

Identifiers

PMID19937089
OpenAlexW2075666595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.