Trial reportJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2010
The diagnostic performance of APC-PCI complex determination compared to D-dimer in the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis.
Trial report in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Identification of novel diagnostic biomarkers for deep venous thrombosis.British journal of haematology · 2018Trial
- Evaluation of Expression Level of Apolipoprotein M as a Diagnostic Marker for Primary Venous Thromboembolism.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis · 2018Article
- Predictive role of high sensitivity troponin T within four hours from presentation of acute coronary syndrome in elderly patients.BMC emergency medicine · 2016Article
- Biochemical markers for the diagnosis of venous thromboembolism: the past, present and future.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2010Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
unlabelledD-dimer testing is widely used as part of the diagnostic algorithm for the exclusion of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) but is considered of limited in value for ruling DVT in. Since D-dimers are poorly defined, there is no standardization of the assays and this makes reliable comparisons between clinical studies difficult. We report on a performance evaluation of a new marker of activated coagulation (Activated Protein-C in complex with Protein-C inhibitor, APC-PCI complex) compared to two quantitative D-dimer assays (Vidas D-dimer Exclusion and Autodimer). The post-hoc comparison was made on 350 frozen plasma samples from consecutive outpatients suspected of DVT in a multicenter management study including clinical probability score, D-dimer testing, venous ultrasound and contrast venography as part of the diagnostic algorithm.
resultsThe APC-PCI complex performed inferior to the D-dimer assays in terms of sensitivity: 74 vs. >93%, negative predictive value: 91 vs. >96% and area under the curve: 0.82 vs. 0.9, but showed a significantly higher specificity: 80 vs. 40-60%. Specificity for the APC-PCI complex did not decrease with higher clinical probability score and the positive predictive value was significantly higher than that of the D-dimer assays in the intermediate/high probability cohort (66 vs. <52%). In this probability cohort, high levels of the APC-PCI complex and to a lesser extent, D-dimers, can give positive predictive values of >90% in up to 20% of the patients which indicates important clinical implications. However, for the exclusion of DVT at the pre-specified cut-off level, the APC-PCI complex perform inferior to the D-dimer assays in this study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.