ArticleCurrent microbiology2010
Identification of actinomycetes producing phospholipase d with high transphosphatidylation activity.
Article in Current microbiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- ARTP mutagenesis of phospholipase D-producing strainHeliyon · 2022Article
- Identification of a novel phospholipase D gene and effects of carbon sources on its expression in Bacillus cereus ZY12.Journal of microbiology (Seoul, Korea) · 2018Article
- Purification, biochemical characterization, and cloning of phospholipase D from Streptomyces racemochromogenes strain 10-3.The protein journal · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Previously we isolated six actinomycetes strains, 9-4, 10-1, 10-2, 10-3, 10-6, and 21-4, that produce phospholipase D (PLD) with high transphosphatidylation activity. In this study, we identified these strains, and the PLD activities were compared with those of reference strains. 16S rDNA sequences and DNA-DNA hybridization tests indicated taxonomic affiliations of strain 9-6 with Streptomyces senoensis, strains 10-1 and 10-6 with S. vinaceus, and strains 10-2 and 10-3 with S. racemochromogenes. Strain 21-4, though identified as a Streptomyces sp., could not be identified with any known species. Meanwhile, most of the culture supernatants of reference strains demonstrated no or very weak PLD activity, while those of our strains exhibited significantly higher activity. All of the strains in this study were identified as Streptomyces species. The PLD activity of our strains exceeded most of the reference Streptomyces strains. The findings in this study imply that the Streptomyces strains, although they are members of the same species, can produce different quantities of PLD enzyme.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.