ArticleImmunogenetics2010
Genetic control of the B cell response to LPS: opposing effects in peritoneal versus splenic B cell populations.
Article in Immunogenetics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Absent the pre-B cell receptor checkpoint, the B-1a immunoglobulin CDR-H3 repertoire normalizes by convergent selection.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- The immunodominant antibody response to Zika virus NS1 protein is characterized by cross-reactivity to self.The Journal of experimental medicine · 2021Article
- The Global Self-Reactivity Profile of the Natural Antibody Repertoire Is Largely Independent of Germline DH Sequence.Frontiers in immunology · 2016Article
- A rapid and quantitative method for the evaluation of V gene usage, specificities and the clonal size of B cell repertoires.Journal of immunological methods · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) from gram-negative bacteria activates B cells, enabling them to proliferate and differentiate into plasma cells. This response is critically dependent on the expression of TLR4; but other genes, such as RP105 and MHC class II, have also been shown to contribute to B cell LPS response. Here, we have evaluated the role of genetic control of the B cell response to LPS at the single cell level. We compared the response to LPS of peritoneal cavity (PEC) and splenic B cells on the BALB/c genetic background (LPS-low responder) to those on the C57BL/6J background (LPS-high responder) and their F1 progeny (CB6F1). Both PEC and splenic B cells from B6 exhibited 100% clonal growth in the presence of LPS; whereas, BALB/c PEC and splenic B cells achieved only 50% and 23% clonal growth, respectively. Adding CpG to the LPS stimulus pushed PEC B cell clonal growth in the low responder strain BALB/c up to 90%, showing that the nonresponse to LPS is a specific effect. Surprisingly, PEC B cells on the F1 background behaved as high responders, while splenic B cells behaved as low responders to LPS. The data presented here reveals a previous unsuspected behavior in the genetic control of the B cell response to LPS with an opposing impact in splenic versus peritoneal cavity B cells. These results suggest the existence of an, as yet, unidentified genetic factor exclusively expressed by coelomic B cells that contributes to the control of the LPS signaling pathway in the B lymphocyte.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.