ReviewPediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany)2010
Efficacy and safety of angiotensin II receptor type 1 antagonists in children and adolescents.
Review in Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of diet, enalapril, or losartan in post-diarrheal hemolytic uremic syndrome nephropathy.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2011Trial
- A perspective on small molecules targeting the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and their utility in cardiovascular diseases: exploring the structural insights for rational drug discovery and development.RSC medicinal chemistry · 2025Review
- Clinical guidelines for the diagnosis, evaluation, and management of hypertension for Korean children and adolescents: the Korean Working Group of Pediatric Hypertension.Kidney research and clinical practice · 2025Article
- Treatment of Metabolic Syndrome in Children.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2019Review
- Pharmacologic Treatment of Pediatric Hypertension.Current hypertension reports · 2016Review
- Additive antiproteinuric effect of enalapril and losartan in children with hemolytic uremic syndrome.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2013Article
- Therapeutic options for the treatment of hypertension in children and adolescents.Clinical medicine insights. Circulatory, respiratory and pulmonary medicine · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Our purpose was to evaluate the effects of angiotensin II receptor type 1 antagonists (ARAs) in children and adolescents with hypertension or/and several kinds of nephropathies on blood pressure (BP) and proteinuria and to evaluate related safety issues. Data sources were Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, BIOSIS Previews, contact with investigators and manufacturers, personal bibliography of the lead author, and manual searches. We selected randomized controlled trials (RCTs), uncontrolled trials, and case series investigating ARAs in children and adolescents, as well as case reports about adverse events and the embryotoxic effects of ARAs in children. In four RCTs with 698 individuals, mean systolic blood pressure (BP) decreased by 10.5 mmHg [95% confidence interval (CI) 9.8-11.2] and mean diastolic BP by 6.4 mmHg (95% CI 5.8-7.0). Proteinuria decreased by 30-64% (range) in two RCTs and four case series. Safety data were comparable with adult safety data. ARAs can be considered effective and safe in lowering BP and proteinuria in the pediatric age group. The correlation between the surrogate parameters BP and proteinuria with clinical endpoints is documented to a large degree. The evidence is based on RCTs and also on lower evidence levels, such as case series. In some conditions, RCTs in children are not feasible. Registers could provide more evidence in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.