ArticleDer Nervenarzt2010
[The health economics of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in Germany. Part 2: Therapeutic options and their cost-effectiveness].
Article in Der Nervenarzt, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- The estimation of utility weights in cost-utility analysis for mental disorders: a systematic review.PharmacoEconomics · 2013Pooled it
- Differences in frequency between administrative and parent-reported ADHD diagnosis data of children and adolescents taking sociodemographic characteristics into account - Results from the consortium project INTEGRATE-ADHD.Journal of health monitoring · 2024Article
- Accident patterns in trauma surgery patients with and without self-reported ADHD.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2019Article
- Costs and treatment patterns of incident ADHD patients - a comparative analysis before and after the initial diagnosis.Health economics review · 2015Article
- [The health economics of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in Germany. Part 1: Health care utilization and cost of illness].Der Nervenarzt · 2010Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) has been associated with a continuous increase of health care utilization and thus expenditures. This raises the issue of cost-effectiveness of health care provided for patients with ADHD. Comparative health economic evaluations generate relevant insights and typically report incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) of alternatives versus an established standard. Typically, results of cost-effectiveness analyses (CEAs) are reported in terms of incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). International evaluations, as well specific adaptations to Germany, indicate an acceptable to attractive cost-effectiveness--according to currently used international benchmarks--of an intense medication management strategy based on stimulants, primarily methylphenidate, with ICERs ranging from 20,000 EUR to 37,000 EUR per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. Economic modeling studies also suggest cost-effectiveness of long-acting modified-release preparations of methylphenidate, owing to improved treatment compliance associated with simplified once daily administration schemes. Atomoxetine, in contrast, appears economically inferior compared to long-acting stimulants, given its higher acquisition costs and at best equal clinical effectiveness. There are currently no data supporting the cost-effectiveness of psychotherapeutic or behavioral interventions. Economic evaluations, which have been published to date, are generally limited by time horizons of up to 1 year and by their prevailing focus on ADHD core symptom improvement only. Therefore, further research into the cost-effectiveness of ADHD treatment strategies seems warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.