ArticlePloS one2009
Exploiting amino acid composition for predicting protein-protein interactions.
Article in PloS one, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed, 98 citations in OpenAlex.
- Spirulina (Food chemistry: X · 2026Article
- AMP-CapsNet: a multi-view feature fusion approach for antimicrobial peptide prediction using capsule networks.Genomics & informatics · 2026Article
- Seq2Bind webserver for binding site prediction from sequences using fine-tuned protein language models.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2025Article
- BroadAMP-GPT: AI-Driven generation of broad-spectrum antimicrobial peptides for combating multidrug-resistant ESKAPE pathogens.Gut microbes · 2025Article
- MOFormer: navigating the antimicrobial peptide design space with Pareto-based multi-objective transformer.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- AllerTrans: a deep learning method for predicting the allergenicity of protein sequences.Biology methods & protocols · 2025Article
- An optimized deep-forest algorithm using a modified differential evolution optimization algorithm: A case of host-pathogen protein-protein interaction prediction.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Article
- PepNet: an interpretable neural network for anti-inflammatory and antimicrobial peptides prediction using a pre-trained protein language model.Communications biology · 2024Article
- A Computational Predictor for Accurate Identification of Tumor Homing Peptides by Integrating Sequential and Deep BiLSTM Features.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2024Article
- Identify Diabetes-related Targets based on ForgeNet_GPC.Current computer-aided drug design · 2024Article
- Determining human-coronavirus protein-protein interaction using machine intelligence.Medicine in novel technology and devices · 2023Article
- Computational Analysis Predicts Correlations among Amino Acids in SARS-CoV-2 Proteomes.Biomedicines · 2023Article
- Anticoagulant Oligonucleotide-Peptide Conjugates: Identification of Thrombin Aptamer Conjugates with Improved Characteristics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Predicting Protein-Protein Interactions via Gated Graph Attention Signed Network.Biomolecules · 2021Article
- PredCRG: A computational method for recognition of plant circadian genes by employing support vector machine with Laplace kernel.Plant methods · 2021Article
- Improved cytokine-receptor interaction prediction by exploiting the negative sample space.BMC bioinformatics · 2020Article
- Machine learning techniques for sequence-based prediction of viral-host interactions between SARS-CoV-2 and human proteins.Biomedical journal · 2020Article
- Deep-AmPEP30: Improve Short Antimicrobial Peptides Prediction with Deep Learning.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2020Article
- Improved detection of DNA-binding proteins via compression technology on PSSM information.PloS one · 2017Article
- Fundamentals of protein interaction network mapping.Molecular systems biology · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundComputational prediction of protein interactions typically use protein domains as classifier features because they capture conserved information of interaction surfaces. However, approaches relying on domains as features cannot be applied to proteins without any domain information. In this paper, we explore the contribution of pure amino acid composition (AAC) for protein interaction prediction. This simple feature, which is based on normalized counts of single or pairs of amino acids, is applicable to proteins from any sequenced organism and can be used to compensate for the lack of domain information.
resultsAAC performed at par with protein interaction prediction based on domains on three yeast protein interaction datasets. Similar behavior was obtained using different classifiers, indicating that our results are a function of features and not of classifiers. In addition to yeast datasets, AAC performed comparably on worm and fly datasets. Prediction of interactions for the entire yeast proteome identified a large number of novel interactions, the majority of which co-localized or participated in the same processes. Our high confidence interaction network included both well-studied and uncharacterized proteins. Proteins with known function were involved in actin assembly and cell budding. Uncharacterized proteins interacted with proteins involved in reproduction and cell budding, thus providing putative biological roles for the uncharacterized proteins.
conclusionAAC is a simple, yet powerful feature for predicting protein interactions, and can be used alone or in conjunction with protein domains to predict new and validate existing interactions. More importantly, AAC alone performs at par with existing, but more complex, features indicating the presence of sequence-level information that is predictive of interaction, but which is not necessarily restricted to domains.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.