Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19936254›Full record

ArticlePloS one2009

Exploiting amino acid composition for predicting protein-protein interactions.

Sushmita Roy, Diego Martinez, Harriett Platero, Terran Lane, Margaret Werner-Washburne

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 98 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Spirulina (Food chemistry: X · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Identify Diabetes-related Targets based on ForgeNet_GPC.Current computer-aided drug design · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sushmita RoySushmita Roy Computer Science, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States of America. sroy@cs.unm.edu
Diego Martinez
Harriett Platero
Terran Lane
Margaret Werner-Washburne
University of New Mexico · US

Funding

GENOMIC DATABASE FOR THE YEAST SACCHAROMYCESP41HG001315 · NHGRI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CHERRY, J. MICHAEL · 1995 to 2010
$27.1M
Genomic Resource for the Yeast SaccharomycesU41HG001315 · NHGRI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CHERRY, J. MICHAEL · 2011 to 2020
$26.4M
Genomic Resource for the Yeast SaccharomycesU24HG001315 · NHGRI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Stacia Engel, Gavin J Sherlock · 2021 to 2026
$10.9M
UNM Initiative to Maximize Student Diversity (IMSD)R25GM060201 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO · PI WERNER-WASHBURNE, MARGRET C. · 2000 to 2017
$9.9M
A compendium of gene expression in stationary phaseR01GM067593 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO · PI WERNER-WASHBURNE, MARGARET C. · 2002 to 2005
$1.6M
CRCNS: Bayesian Analysis of Neural-Behavioral Interactions in Mental IllnessR01MH076282 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO · PI LANE, TERRAN D. R. · 2005 to 2007
$964k
Howard Hughes Medical Institute 56005678NHGRI NIH HHS HG01315NHGRI NIH HHS P41 HG001315NHGRI NIH HHS U24 HG001315NHGRI NIH HHS U41 HG001315NIGMS NIH HHS GM60201NIGMS NIH HHS GM67593NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM067593NIGMS NIH HHS R25 GM060201NIMH NIH HHS 1R01MH076282NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH076282
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundComputational prediction of protein interactions typically use protein domains as classifier features because they capture conserved information of interaction surfaces. However, approaches relying on domains as features cannot be applied to proteins without any domain information. In this paper, we explore the contribution of pure amino acid composition (AAC) for protein interaction prediction. This simple feature, which is based on normalized counts of single or pairs of amino acids, is applicable to proteins from any sequenced organism and can be used to compensate for the lack of domain information.

resultsAAC performed at par with protein interaction prediction based on domains on three yeast protein interaction datasets. Similar behavior was obtained using different classifiers, indicating that our results are a function of features and not of classifiers. In addition to yeast datasets, AAC performed comparably on worm and fly datasets. Prediction of interactions for the entire yeast proteome identified a large number of novel interactions, the majority of which co-localized or participated in the same processes. Our high confidence interaction network included both well-studied and uncharacterized proteins. Proteins with known function were involved in actin assembly and cell budding. Uncharacterized proteins interacted with proteins involved in reproduction and cell budding, thus providing putative biological roles for the uncharacterized proteins.

conclusionAAC is a simple, yet powerful feature for predicting protein interactions, and can be used alone or in conjunction with protein domains to predict new and validate existing interactions. More importantly, AAC alone performs at par with existing, but more complex, features indicating the presence of sequence-level information that is predictive of interaction, but which is not necessarily restricted to domains.

Indexed as

Protein Interaction MappingAlgorithmsAmino AcidsAnimalsCaenorhabditis elegansComputational BiologyDimerizationDrosophilaEvolution, MolecularFungal ProteinsOpen Reading FramesProbabilityProteinsProteomeProteomicsAmino AcidsFungal ProteinsProteinsProteome

Identifiers

PMID19936254
PMCPMC2775920
OpenAlexW1987582651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.