ArticleGene regulation and systems biology2007
Variability of DNA microarray gene expression profiles in cultured rat primary hepatocytes.
Article in Gene regulation and systems biology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Villain of Molecular Biology: Why are we not reproducible in research?F1000Research · 2015Article
- A comprehensive collection of systems biology data characterizing the host response to viral infection.Scientific data · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
DNA microarray is a powerful tool in biomedical research. However, transcriptomic profiling using DNA microarray is subject to many variations including biological variability. To evaluate the different sources of variation in mRNA gene expression profiles, gene expression profiles were monitored using the Affymetrix RatTox U34 arrays in cultured primary hepatocytes derived from six rats over a 26 hour period at 6 time points (0 h, 2h, 5h, 8h, 14 h and 26 h) with two replicate arrays at each time point for each animal. In addition, the impact of sample size on the variability of differentially expressed gene lists and the consistency of biological responses were also investigated. Excellent intra-animal reproducibility was obtained at all time points with 0 out of 370 present probe sets across all time points showing significant difference between the 2 replicate arrays (3-way ANOVA, p <or= 0.0001). However, large inter-animal biological variation in mRNA expression profiles was observed with 337 out of 370 present probe sets showing significant differences among 6 animals (3-way ANOVA, p <or= 0.05). Principal Component Analysis (PCA) revealed that time effect (PC1) in this data set accounted for 47.4% of total variance indicating the dynamics of transcriptomics. The second and third largest effects came from animal difference, which accounted for 16.9% (PC2 and PC3) of the total variance. The reproducibility of gene lists and their functional classification was declined considerably when the sample size was decreased. Overall, our results strongly support that there is significant inter-animal variability in the time-course gene expression profiles, which is a confounding factor that must be carefully evaluated to correctly interpret microarray gene expression studies. The consistency of the gene lists and their biological functional classification are also sensitive to sample size with the reproducibility decreasing considerably under small sample size.
Indexed as
Identifiers
19936092PMC2759134What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.